My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006717_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
3721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0700396
>
SU0006717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
9/8/2019 12:58:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006717
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0700396
STREET_NUMBER
3721
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
APN
17915026
ENTERED_DATE
9/6/2007 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3721 S HWY 99
RECEIVED_DATE
9/4/2007 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\3721\PA-0700396\SU0006717\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
gUlry o SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton •CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420•Fax: (209)464-0138• Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING gSTUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: .3 21 5 . 5y IZl- �// PA#: b Z - 000 3 9(. <br /> REPORT DATE: L>3 i7tT <br /> cient <br /> I = ImuSufffficie San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9.1105,Section 9.1105.2 <br /> 1 = InsutTicien[ <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> NL y <br /> ❑ ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. >p'� e �O <br /> ❑ ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ❑ ❑ y 'tS-kOL <br /> 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient.P9 IN <br /> F-12.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the 3`i t <br /> site. <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. N. ',,,t4 —ol, ib-S rb '05 N <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> Z] ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. Pg 111 � <br /> YJ ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. p(, fq�l <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site, 1,6 % - Ia r'l � <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model,if applicable. o W 4("& 1 t APPS ,a.,..Inj tV L- <br /> FA ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc. i b /t /V L. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. 0b 11 rJ v <br /> ❑ ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concem, at and/or around the project site. Pb bl <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. r Qp V„ r- <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: yLG Reviewed Date: 311 -IlOff <br /> urru 2Q02m2 Pagel of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7114nW3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.