My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003611 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NORTH RIPON
>
16910
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
LA-01-102
>
SU0003611 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:05 AM
Creation date
9/8/2019 1:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0003611
PE
2690
FACILITY_NAME
LA-01-102
STREET_NUMBER
16910
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
NORTH RIPON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIPON
APN
20308022
ENTERED_DATE
5/7/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
16910 S NORTH RIPON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
2/19/2002 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\NORTH RIPON\16910\LA-01-102\SU0003611\NL_SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,�?`l am•c� SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> G\ <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Veber Avenue 3d Floor Stockton• CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420 Far:(209)464-0138• if eb:www.co.san-joaqui>Lraus/ehd <br /> 'fir FCO <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PA <br /> SITE LOCATION: �LD/��/ `O ad. )A'I&.* <br /> REPORT DATE: 7 Q> <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-11052 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ❑ ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> 0 ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at thsite and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. r r1'1 0.4 e'I`eAr <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to sol and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site.�' �Ghe <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate fomwla/model,if applicable- <br /> 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient welts,rivers,lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> 1 <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> �' ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project- <br /> 0, <br /> roject-i r ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact tO soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the project site- <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.2 The attachmentslappendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: <br /> Reviewed Date: <br /> EitD 26-02-002 Page I of 2 Surface S Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.