Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. James T. Burroughs <br /> Mr. Chandler Martin <br /> September 6, 1995 <br /> Page Two <br /> The proposed project includes the Calaveras River which is State-owned sovereign lands <br /> of the State of California as described above. Proposed development located within these <br /> waterways would be subject to the SLC's permitting process and the Commission would be a <br /> responsible Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br /> The SLC is particularly concerned with the natural resources and public recreation <br /> opportunities associated with lands under its jurisdiction. We are concerned that the <br /> environmental review and decision-making processes of all agencies take into account the <br /> impacts that projects may have on public trust resources in and along the State's waterways. <br /> The County's Proposed Negative Declaration does not include sufficient information for <br /> staff of the SLC to determine the appropriate environmental documentation necessary under the <br /> CEQA. <br /> Section 21080 (c) (2) of the Public Resources Code [15070 (b) (1) of the State <br /> Guidelines] provides that a Lead Agency shall prepare a Negative Declaration when: <br /> "(2) An Initial Study identified potentially significant effects, but (i) revisions in the <br /> project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before the proposed <br /> Negative Declaration is released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the <br /> effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur..." <br /> The subject Negative Declaration does not provide an environmental analysis of the potential <br /> impacts which may occur from the proposed project. The environmental document should <br /> discuss the full range of environmental issues required under CEQA, including but not limited to, <br /> compatibility with the long-term land use designation, water quality relating to placement of the <br /> docks and uses of the various sewage septic systems at each dock; biology, including native, <br /> raze. endangered, and threatened plant, animal and aquatic species, and species of special <br /> concern. and the potential degradation/loss of wetland and upland habitats, aesthetic impacts as <br /> viewed from users of the waterwav and the nearby residential developments; access and parking <br /> for users of the docks, lighting, noise, glare, waterborne transportation/circulation, and risk of <br /> upset. The project description should include the type of vessels the docks would accommodate <br /> and whether the docks would be commercially leased for short-term or long-term uses and <br /> describe the extent of each type of use. The document should include a list of the persons <br /> contacted and their comments concerning the proposed project within their jurisdiction. <br />