Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 5. The carves of Figures I and 2 show the strong Conclusions <br /> influence of the rainfall recharge component on the resul- The accumulation of nitrate in the upper Batu <br /> tant nitrate-nitrogen concentration. The application of the zone is a cumulative effect of on-site sewage disposal <br /> methods presented in this paper and the reasonableness of tires which has not been addressed by standard sitin <br /> the results are,therefore,limited by the accuracy with which design criteria.This paper presents a convenient meths <br /> the rainfall recharge fraction can be estimated or determined estimating long-term increases in ground-water ni. <br /> by the user. For best results, the user should perform a nitrogen caused by on-site sewage disposal. The mete <br /> thorough water balance analysis using techniques such as useful to practicing engineers and regulatory agencie <br /> those developed by the U.S.D.A.Soil Conservation Service the general planning and evaluation of residential dev, <br /> (196 4) or Thornthwaite and Mather(1955), or other infor- ments as well as for the site-specific design of on-site se- <br /> mation based on local studies. disposal systems. This is evidenced by their adoptir <br /> parts of California. <br /> Planning Applications The greatest potential for ground-water nitrate-nitr <br /> The nitrate assessment procedures outlined in this problems arises in areas of low rainfall recharge and <br /> paper may have a number of land use and environmental development density. The situation may be critical if <br /> planning applications.A principal advantage is the minimal ground waters are used for domestic water supply.Exi <br /> requirement for data. communities and cluster developments using large, . <br /> mon septic tank disposal fields are also likely to f <br /> Zoning and Subdivision Proposals significant concern because of the high concentratic <br /> Preliminary evaluation of potential water quality waste-water disposal in a limited area. In newer dev <br /> impacts is useful when broad land use planning decisions are ments,mandatory space requirements for roads,build <br /> being made. Computation of A or use of Figure 2 can open space,etc.,will sometimes keep the overall intens <br /> provide an initial basis for determining appropriate develop- development and waste-water application below cr <br /> ment densities to assure protection of areal ground-water levels. <br /> quality. 'F Comparison of predicted values with actual <br /> Residential subdivision proposals can be screened for sampling data for several case study locations in Califs <br /> potential long-term nitrate impacts by applying equations confirms that the methods provide reasonable first api <br /> (1) and (2). The North Coast Regional Water Quality imations of nitrate-nitrogen effects in ground water I <br /> Control Board of California and several local health septic tank disposal fields.The agreement between pred <br /> departments have adopted these procedures for this pur- and observed values is sufficient to enable potential are <br /> pose.An indication of no potentially excessive nitrate build- concern to be identified, thus making the method an e <br /> up in ground water according to the analyses presented in tive planning tool. <br /> this paper would obviate the need for further study. In the A promising application of these nitrate assessr, <br /> event that preliminary analyses indicate possible problems procedures is for regulatory purposes. The limited <br /> (e.g., planned development density exceeds 1/A), further requirements and straightforward computations makt <br /> analyses might be required to define the ground-water approach widely suitable for evaluation of zoning and <br /> system and potential effects more specifically. Also,mitiga- use plans, subdivision proposals, and continued devL <br /> tion measures and ground-water monitoring requirements ment in unsewered areas.The need for mitigation meast <br /> may be formulated based on the preliminary nitrate predic- long-term monitoring, or more detailed site investigat <br /> tions. Possible mitigation measures might include reducing can also be readily determined by use of these procedL <br /> development and sewage loading densities, incorporating <br /> nitrogen removal systems (Laak, 1982), or modifying the Acknowledgments <br /> disposal system locations or design(Harkin et al., 1979). This paper was developed from a study supporter <br /> Buildout in Existing Unsewered Areas United States Environmental Protection Agency Grant <br /> Continued buildout of certain existing development <br /> P009211010 and by California North Coast Regional\k <br /> Quality Control Board Contract No. 0-092-118-0. <br /> areas using on-site sewage disposal systems may pose signifi- <br /> cant long-term ground-water nitrate concerns. In cases <br /> where development density is approaching critical levels References <br /> predicted by equation (2), then further analysis of possible Alexander, M. 1965. Nitrification. Soil Nitrogen. W <br /> localized problems and more complete study of the ground- Bartholomew and F. E. Clark, eds. American Societ <br /> water system is warranted. Ground-water monitoring may Agronomy,Inc., Madison,WI.Agronomy Series,Nc <br /> pp. 307-343. <br /> be used to verify the water quality concerns indic-ted by the Broadbent, F. E.and F.Clark. 1967. Denitrification.Soil N <br /> predictive equations. The preliminary analyses using equa- gen. W. V. Bartholomew and F. E. Clark,eds. Amer <br /> tions (1) and (2) provide a rational basis for the design of Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI. Agron <br /> field monitoring programs. Specific mitigation measures, Series, No. 10. pp. 344-359. <br /> including modified design standards,might be appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Central C <br /> for any additional development that would tend to aggra- Region(CRWQCB). 1983. Los Osos/Baywood Parkbasin plan amendment. Staff Report. 75 pp. <br /> rr _`�• <br /> vate observed ground-water quality problems. California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Central C <br /> .198 <br />