My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John Funderburg <br /> SCH#2005082001 <br /> November 30,2011 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> Another significant omission in the FEIR is the discussion of railroads/rail corridors within the <br /> local roadways and traffic conditions similar to the categories for Transit facilities,Bicycle and <br /> Pedestrian facilities. Additionally,the CPUC is missing from the Regulatory Setting under the <br /> State Agencies and is considered the expert on rail safety for the purpose of this review. <br /> The above substantial evidence as submitted raises the question; can the Planning Commission <br /> make the best informed decision without all the necessary information before them,as CEQA <br /> requires that a lead Agency neither approve nor carry out a project as proposed if there are feasible <br /> alternatives or mitigation measures that would avoid or substantially lesson the significant <br /> environmental effects of this project(CEQA Guidelines Sections 15021, 15091,and 15092). <br /> Without recirculation of the Transportation Traffic Section of the FEIR,the finding in the staff <br /> report under Transportation and Traffic is without merit, since the traffic analysis failed to include <br /> the at-grade railroad crossings and therefore, a determination for No Mitigation Measures is <br /> without justification and grounds not to certify the Transportation Traffic Section of the FEIR as <br /> presented. <br /> We do however, concur with the staff recommendation as presented in the staff report; Deny the <br /> Revisions of Approved Actions Quarry Excavation." <br /> Please advise us of the Planning Commission decision for the proposed project FEIR. <br /> Thank you for your consideration of these comments. If you have any questions, please contact me <br /> at(415) 713-0092 or email at ms2�a cpuc.caggv. <br /> JSincerely, <br /> Moses Stites <br /> Rail Corridor Safety Specialist <br /> Consumer Protection and Safety Division <br /> Rail Transit and Crossings Branch <br /> 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 115 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95834-2939 <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.