My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The introduction of haul trucks vs. automobiles is a completely different noise source. <br /> The frequency content (low rumble) of trucks vs. the tire-on-pavement higher frequency <br /> content of an automobile is distinctly different. Based upon the Appendix C I of the Draft <br /> EIR, the existing roadway traffic volumes along East River Road during the nighttime <br /> hours is as little as 3 automobiles between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 2:00 am. The <br /> project is expected to result in one haul truck passby every two minutes during that <br /> period. <br /> Even with the proposed mitigation, background hourly noise levels are still expected to <br /> increase by over 10 dBA. Generally, CEQA considers a significant increase in noise to <br /> be 3 dBA. Lets not forget that the mitigation was supposed to be implemented during the <br /> temporary permit in August 2011. The noise measurement results did not support that <br /> the mitigation was effective. <br /> Overall Reporting of Noise Impacts <br /> I think that it is interesting that the original noise analysis indicated that the noise levels <br /> from the asphalt plant would be as low as 35 dBA Leq during operations, based upon <br /> noise measurement data collected by Bollard. Now, as the process has continued, the <br /> predicted noise levels are equal to the nighttime standard of 45 dBA I.eq. However, no <br /> noise measurements have ever been conducted by Bollard at the Adrienne residence. The <br /> j.c. brennan data indicates that noise levels from the batch plant could be as high as 55 <br /> dBA Leq, and is consistently above 45 dBA Leq. <br /> It is also interesting that the original analysis by Bollard estimated the sleep disturbance <br /> to be approximately 5% to 10% using an antiquated method for calculating the potential <br /> for sleep disturbance. This analysis was used even though Bollard was fully aware of the <br /> more recent research in calculating sleep disturbance. Now the EIR states that there is a <br /> 99% to 100% chance for sleep disturbance or potential for awakening. However, the <br /> conclusions are still misleading, due to the fact that they assume that the majority of <br /> people are awakening due to existing traffic and that the trucks (1 every 2 minutes) will <br /> not significantly affect the potential for awakening. <br /> If you or the county staff has questions,please contact me. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> j.c. brennan &,associates, Inc. <br /> sident <br /> Member: Institute of Noise Control Engineering <br /> file: 2011-148 Munn Perkins-February 2012 - VI <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.