My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.......... ............ .....................__.._.-..----------_----- <br /> buffer <br /> ---------_-----buffer area around the plant has remained the same. The facility can run 16 hours per day seven days per week,a <br /> fairly new occurrence that seems to happen more and more often is the use of rubberized asphalt. When the <br /> rubberized asphalt is produced the stench and smoke fills covers our properties burning our noses and eyes,and <br /> �i seeps into our homes. It is especially bad at night because there is little air movement and an inversion which <br /> k t concentrates the stench in our area. I see nowhere on their application how they intend to remedy this problem, <br /> the only solution I know is to add a smell masking agent.....they don't work, <br /> & ; A night job is no small undertaking,while they may turn some back-up beepers off,and tell the€r drivers <br /> not to use jake brakes they still have to run the asphalt plant,run their loaders,and have up to 100 trucks or more <br /> in-hauling,out�haul€ng,dumping loads,revving engines and squealing brakes. During,last-summer•'s night run it was <br /> impossible to sleep and we couldn't go outside because of the stencil and smoke. We have the right to 8 hours <br /> per day not to have this nuisance. <br /> George Reed does have ocher plants that they can source this material from and while 1 understand <br /> f ' trucking costs might be higher these plants are situated where they do not impact residents in the area,they also <br /> have a portable rubberized asphalt plant that might only affect residents for the duration of one job,not day after <br /> day year after year. This operation can no longer be considered a quarry,but a processing plant as now virtually <br /> all their rock and most of their sand is trucked in from out of county. <br /> f <br /> The supposition on page 7 of their noise study that the noise from a rock processing plant should be <br /> considered the same as Agricultural noise is absurd. first of all crushing rocks and making asphalt is not growing <br /> food and fiber! We who live here do expect Ag noise,it comes and goes,a tractor moves across a field and is <br /> '-= gone, a farmer applies a pesticide and moves on. Farming operations are not cemented.to the ground with 100's <br /> of trucks feeding it daily day after day,year after year. Also, the Noise study does not address the in-hauling and <br /> dumping of road grindings that usually accompanies a night paving job. If you read the appendices of the report <br /> many times in the 24 hour noise monitoring the acceptable levels set by the county. <br /> If the Community Development Dept,against the wishes and well-being of the residents of our arca <br /> Fdecide to let the asphalt plant to work at night they need to clearly define the ambiguous application. The <br /> production of rubberized asphalt should absolutely not be allowed at night, even with the addition of smell masking <br /> agents it is unbearable. The county should define what an occasional night is,1 would define it as one or two nights <br /> a year,while the plant might consider it whenever they can get a bid that involves night work. The number of <br /> trucks that are allowed to enter and exit the plant at night should be limited, i can assure you that the 100 trucks <br /> per night of last summer is many times too many. . <br /> I am not advocating trying to stop all operations at this facility, but feel that we have already been unfairly <br /> burdened, enough is enough,no further expansion of any kind. Before the County considers expanding operating <br /> #,.. hours they should be requiring the plant to take proactive steps to reduce their impact on us like enclosing the <br /> plant, containing smells,and reducing truck noise,all of which are realistic options,and have been required at <br /> other operations. <br /> Thank-You <br /> - -------- <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.