Laserfiche WebLink
Effects of Single-Event Noise <br /> A single event is an individual distinct loud activity, such as an aircraft overflight, train or truck <br /> passage. Because most noise policies applicable to transportation noise sources are specified <br /> in terms of 24-hour-averaged descriptors, such as Ldn or CNEL, the potential for annoyance or <br /> sleep disturbance associated with individual loud events can be masked by the averaging <br /> process. <br /> Like most jurisdictions, San Joaquin County's noise policies do not address single-event noise. <br /> But because this project involves an increase in nighttime truck traffic trips in an area where <br /> existing residences are located, single-event noise associated with nighttime truck passages are <br /> evaluated in this report. <br /> Extensive studies have been conducted regarding the effects of single-event noise on sleep <br /> disturbance, with the Sound Exposure Level (SEL) metric being the most common used for <br /> such assessments. SEL represents the entire sound energy of a given event normalized into a <br /> one-second period regardless of event duration. As a result, the single-number SEL metric <br /> contains information pertaining to both event duration and intensity. Another descriptor utilized <br /> to assess single-event noise is the maximum, or Lmax, noise level associated with the event. A <br /> problem with utilizing Lmax to assess singe events is that the duration of the event is not <br /> considered. <br /> It should be noted that there is currently an on-going nationwide debate regarding the <br /> appropriateness of SEL criteria as a supplement or replacement for cumulative noise level <br /> metrics such as Ldn and CNEL, 24-hour noise descriptors. Nonetheless, because SEL <br /> describes a receiver's total noise exposure from a single impulsive event, SEL is often used to <br /> characterize noise from individual brief loud events. <br /> Due to the wide variation in test subjects reactions to noises of various levels (some test <br /> subjects were awakened by indoor SEL values of 50 dB, whereas others slept through indoor <br /> SEL values exceeding 80 dB), no definitive consensus has been reached with respect to a <br /> universal criterion to apply. To the extent that there is any guidance regarding acceptable SEL, <br /> the emphasis has been on physiological effects, not on land use planning. The Federal <br /> Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise (FICAN) has provided estimates of the percentage of <br /> people expected to be awakened when exposed to specific SEL inside a home (FICAN 1997). <br /> According to the FICAN study, an estimated 5 to 10% of the population is affected when interior <br /> SEL noise levels are between 65 and 81 dB, and few sleep awakenings (less than 5%) are <br /> predicted if the interior SEL is less than 65 dB. <br /> Environmental Norse Analysis <br /> Munn&Perkins Expanded Hours of Operations—San Joaquin County <br /> Page 6 <br />