My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EVALUATION OF EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT <br /> The daytime ambient noise environment in the immediate project vicinity is defined primarily by <br /> the various processing plant activities (asphalt plant, crushing plant, etc.), but is also affected by <br /> local roadway traffic. The nighttime ambient noise environment is consistent with that of typical <br /> rural areas and is defined primarily by natural sounds, (wind, birds, insects, etc.), and by - <br /> intermittent local roadway traffic. During the previous periods of night operations at the Munn & <br /> Perkins facility, the nighttime noise environment was also influenced by plant operations and <br /> additional heavy truck traffic on East River Road. <br /> For this project, there are two distinct noise environments to consider. The first is the noise <br /> environment at residences nearest to the Munn & Perkins plant site where the residences are <br /> more affected by on-site plant equipment noise than off-site traffic noise. Examples of such <br /> locations include the residences located at Sites A and B in Figure 1. <br /> The second noise environment to consider for this project is the noise environment at <br /> residences located along East River Road which are more affected by noise from traffic on East <br /> River Road than by noise generated by on-site plant equipment. Examples of such residential <br /> locations include residences represented by noise measurement Sites 1-5, shown in Figure 2. <br /> It is necessary to distinguish between these two noise environments because the nighttime <br /> operations would result in noise-generation of two distinct sources of noise. Those two distinct <br /> sources include on-site equipment (primarily the asphalt plant), and off-site truck traffic. As a <br /> result, the proposed project could affect various residential receptor locations differently. <br /> Therefore,. separate discussions are provided below for ambient conditions at each distinct <br /> receptor area. It should be noted that some receptors are affected by both on-site noise <br /> sources and East River Road traffic noise sources. In such cases, impacts are evaluated at ... <br /> those locations for both noise sources even though they are included in the category below <br /> which most heavily influences project noise levels at their location. <br /> Ambient Noise Environment at Receptors Affected Primarily by Asphalt <br /> Plant Noise Sources <br /> The closest noise sensitive receptors to the plant site which are primarily affected by on-site <br /> plant-related noise sources (i.e. nearest receptors not affected by traffic noise from East River <br /> Road); are residences located near noise monitoring Sites A and B, shown on Figure 1. These _.. <br /> residences are located generally east and southeast of the plant equipment, approximately <br /> 2.200 feet east and 3,000 feet southeast of the asphalt plant equipment. Although there are <br /> closer residences to the existing asphalt plant equipment than those represented by Sites A & B <br /> on Figure 1, those residences experience higher ambient conditions due to their proximity to <br /> East River Road. As a result, the evaluation of ambient conditions at locations affected <br /> primarily by asphalt plant noise alone focuses on the residences represented by Sites A& B. <br /> Environmental Noise Analysis <br /> Munn&Perkins Expanded Hours of Operations-San Joaquin County <br /> Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.