My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROJECT NOISE GENERATION <br /> Methodology for isolation of Asphalt Plant Noise <br /> During the expanded hours of operations, mining and aggregate crushing/screening activities <br /> would not occur. Therefore, the most significant source of on-site noise generation at the - <br /> residences to the east during the expanded hours of facility operations would be the operation <br /> of the asphalt plant. The Table 4 data, in conjunction with the Appendix B graphs, provide a <br /> comprehensive evaluation of the overall ambient noise environment present at Sites A and B <br /> during the week of monitoring. However, to assess the potential impacts associated with use of <br /> the asphalt plant by itself (without the concurrent noise generation of the aggregate mining, <br /> crushing, and screening activities, as well as local activities and natural sounds), it is important <br /> to isolate the noise generated by the asphalt plant from the rest of the noise environment. <br /> BAC used logs of asphalt and rock plant usage during the week-long noise monitoring program • <br /> with a detailed statistical analysis of the noise measurement results shown in Appendix B to <br /> determine the noise generation of the asphalt plant in isolation. Specific analysis of median <br /> (L50), and background (L90), noise levels was conducted for both the hours in which the <br /> asphalt plant was in operation, as well as the hours adjacent to those hours during which time <br /> the plant was known not to be in operation. <br /> From this assessment, it was concluded that, during the hours the asphalt plant was reportedly <br /> operating, background (L90) noise levels were computed to be approximately 42-43 dB at the <br /> residences represented by noise measurement sites A & B, with measured variations of . <br /> between +/- 5 dB believed to be likely due to changes in atmospheric conditions and operation <br /> of the main rock processing equipment during those same hours. From this analysis, it was <br /> concluded that asphalt plant noise generation at the nearest residences to the east averages <br /> between 35 and 45 dB, with a mean of approximately 40 dB. <br /> Because the noise generation of the asphalt plant is dominated by the operation of the burner at <br /> large distances from the plant equipment, and because the burner is a steady-state noise <br /> source, maximum (Lmax), and average (Leq), noise levels associated with the operation of the <br /> asphalt plant equipment are not appreciably different at the nearest residences located over <br /> 2,000 feet away. <br /> Environmental Noise Analysis <br /> Munn& Perkins Expanded Hours of Operations— San Joaquin County <br /> Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.