Laserfiche WebLink
1.Introduction <br /> a. The Draft 1.".IR or a revision of the draft. <br /> h. Comments and recornrnendations received on the Draft FIR either-verhatim or in <br /> s urTTTTT a ry- <br /> c. A list of-persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting oil the Draft EIR. <br /> d. The responses ofthe lead agency to significant environmental points raised in the review <br /> and consultation process. <br /> e. Any other information added by the lead agency. <br /> After review ofthe project and the f=inal FIR, the San Joaquin County C0111111nnily DeveloprTTent <br /> Department,at a public hearing. will recommend to the County Planning Commission�,liether to <br /> approve or deny the proposed project. The County Planning CormtTTissiorT %Vill then reviQ�� the <br /> project, the Final EIR,the Community Development Department's recommendations, and public <br /> testimony, and consider certification of the EIR and approval or denial of the project. <br /> 1 .3 Organization of the Document <br /> The Final EIR is organized into six chapters. Chapter 1 provides an overvie�N of the CEQA process <br /> and the Final FIR. Chapter 2 provides the comments on the Draft EIR received dt.rrin(I the review <br /> period. Chapter 3 provides the l._ea.d Agency's responses to the comments in Chapter 2. Chapter <br /> 4 includes corrections and additions to the Draft EIR text as a result of ComnIents made oil the Draft <br /> FIR. Chapter 5 includes the Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Plan for the project. Chapters f <br /> contain a list of preparers of the Final FIR and any additional reference materials used in the <br /> preparation of the dOCLI111elTt, respectively. The Draft FIR (May 2011 ) is considered part of the <br /> Final FIR, as amended in Chapter 4 of this document. <br /> Munn&Pe:kens Quarry Excavatiar,Permit 1-3 ESA 1211066 <br /> Final Env-ronmenial Impact Report September 21,11 <br />