Laserfiche WebLink
3 Response to Comments <br /> that potential impacts Were 1101 nnderestinlated, the analysis conducted a—sensitivity analysis' by <br /> evaluating the effect of 100 percent of 11111llest slumber of Project-generated trips (i.e., 66 one-way <br /> trips) on each road'<vay individually. <br /> Table 3.2-2 presents the maximum hourly traffic aloe-each study roadway segment and the roadway <br /> level of service with and e�ithout the project. As shown in the table, and as stated in the last paragraph <br /> on page 3.2-8. if all of the maximum hourly- Project-gencrated trips were to Utilize any of the study <br /> roadways, all study roadway segrilettts WVould continue to operate at an acceptable level of service <br /> (i.e.. the impact Would he less than si(Tnificant). Clearly. the impact also 'would be less than significant <br /> if pro.ycet trips were distributed among the study roadways, and the requested trip distribution and <br /> a;si3Onnlent diagram (and rcviscd Table 3.2-2) is not necessary to provide an accurate anak'Sis of <br /> project impacts. <br /> Response to Comment A-3: <br /> The commenter requests a revised `fable 3.2-2 per the above comment and provides the contact <br /> information tOr fntLlre COrrespOII&FICC. <br /> As described above, Table 3.2-2 represents a maximum ch tribution which C011ld rCSlllt from any <br /> givers night-time operation. A revised distribution table is not necessary. <br /> Letter B (California Regional Wafer Quality Control Board) <br /> Response to Comment B-9: <br /> The commenter snakes an introductory statement and identifies the facility's current permit. <br /> Comment noted: no further response required. <br /> Response to Comment B-2: <br /> The commenter summarizes a portion of the F'.IR's project description and then states that then <br /> cannot anticipate the project making a changes in water rights or'.eater quality. however.. if the <br /> project marcs any changes in Waster discharge type or quantity it must file a Report of Waste. <br /> Discharge. <br /> The comment is correct. the proposed project 'WOUld not cause significant changes in v%ater rights <br /> or 'water quality. It is acknowledged that any future changes in water discharge type or quantity <br /> Mould require a Report of Waste Discharge. <br /> Response to Comment B-3: <br /> The conlrncnter makes a closing statement and provides their contact information. <br /> Comment noted: no Further response required. <br /> M.nn&PerS,rr5 Quarry&(;avalion Permil 3-3 ESA 1 211085 <br /> Final Environmental Impact Report September 2011 <br />