Laserfiche WebLink
%.Ljnn&jerkins 0t,arry Excavation Perm <br /> Response to Comment 1-5: <br /> I he commenter states that the pl- ject de,cription is sparse_ va�nc, anti arnbi,�trous in that the <br /> project i not just an exten,ion of hours but an expwision of file proposed we. Connnenter stales <br /> thou the props»ed project allows We apoicarlt to expand into a neyy taaarket. <br /> 11s ciescrihed in Chapter 2 of the I)lAR, nighttime. work Nvill be limited to the asphalt hatch plant, <br /> hadem. and imcks. Acavation activities and the crushing of rock "HI not be permitted during <br /> the cxpandQd rlighttirnc hours. !While the County Quarr� Excavation Permit docs not limit <br /> tonnage. there atv ether legal linANA s on file plant. The asphalt concrete plant is limited to <br /> 5000 tons/da; and 896.350 ton0year by the San .? mquh Valley Air ['ollutiOn Control District. <br /> Ilse plant cern produce up to ,2; ton,lhow. At this rate. there could he 16 hours of continuous <br /> operation be€ore reaching the maximum permitted daily hulk T-he plant is already allowed to <br /> operalc Rw 16 hour~. <br /> In term-, ofcxponsion into a new nmdCt. the eliding plain provides collstruc6011 rllatcrials, �.. <br /> inctudin, asphalt for roads%aty and other infrastructure projects. The Count�' does not agn-ce that <br /> alloxx iu<, the applicant additional tlexib€lits in operating hours represents a significant expariMon <br /> ofusQ. Night lime opuatkwis may chmgc Me nature ofccnain lnlpacty \\ithout changing the - <br /> n.:awro of the use (such as noise). the use remaks aggrezgiate pr'odtlCtrorl. l he applicant's desire: to <br /> meet particnlar highway project specifications is acknowledged in the project description. The <br /> cconilulic rca"ons for thi,, and the changing rllakeul,Ofak7lzgre`Tate market are not relevant to the <br /> analvsis. 11c potentially significant effect, cif night Lillie operations are relevant, and they are tile <br /> sill ject ofthc analyses this EIR. <br /> Response to Comment 1-6: <br /> he connuctim-states that the 125 KOH limitation is meaningless clue to the ",)MAY More are <br /> I", &(.wl.ill'1k'l1 m h�iguage, Thi: conlrllenter States that conskudion dekly'S <br /> al_e the noon and that Munn & Perkins has a history ofniodifving and extending nighttinle <br /> nperatiotl <br /> The number of night operations is capped at 125. The l[Crul --proyidCd there: are no unexpected <br /> delays in C0nstrUCti011" refer>to when these 125 night operations occur, not the total number. If <br /> the pat ing phase of corroushn prc,ject is delaveil. Operations at the Munn R Perkins yyoulcl <br /> also be delay ed. but in 110 event could they exceed 125 nights. Additionally, a minimum <br /> temperature required in Oi-dCr to c10 1 I',hah "ork_ "hieh fur€her limits avadahle day's. Ifnight <br /> time lcnlperatures «e.rc too lnyy. <t night time operation may twee t{a he rescheduled to a warmer <br /> night. This also has the envo oflinliting the dumber ofnight time operations that occur-outside <br /> the Ilor'lllal Ci113titructioll Seasoll. <br /> Response to Comment 1-7: <br /> The commenter states dmi the project description rails to disclose the munber. location and <br /> proxirnil} Of of'site rural residence,. <br /> so.&POWs Qm"E mm, Mri=S 3-3 _ ESA1211DK <br /> i.^.ai�GYIf:?I-.. _,.!1:, �•t.Re,.�. <br /> 5a!>WM 3r 2W 1 <br />