Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Rod Attebery <br /> Neumiller& Beardslee <br /> September 1, 2011 <br /> Page 5 <br /> expected to be slightly below 45 dB Leq. These modeling results are consistent with the noise <br /> measurement results described in the previous section. Although the Figure C data represents <br /> modeled results, and actual noise levels can be expected to vary depending on atmospheric <br /> conditions, the Figure C contours support the noise measurement results and BAC's <br /> conclusions that asphalt plant noise generation is within compliance with San Joaquin County <br /> daytime and nighttime noise level standards at the nearest residences in the project vicinity. <br /> Measurement of Vehicle Pass-by Noise Levels <br /> In addition to the measurement of on-site plant equipment at measurement Site 3 (Figure A), <br /> BAC also conducted single-event pass-by noise measurements at measurement Sites 1 and 2 <br /> (Figure A). These measurements we conducted to determine the typical sound exposure levels <br /> generated by project heavy trucks (both empty and loaded), as well as by non-project vehicles. <br /> The survey consisted of nightly monitoring (9 pm to 5 am) from August 16 through August 25, <br /> 2011, at measurement Site 2, and additional monitoring with BAC staff observations at Site 1 on <br /> the nights of August 16, 22, and 25, 2011. <br /> The monitoring was conducted using matched Larson Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model 820 <br /> precision integrating sound level meters at Sites 1 and 2. The meters were calibrated before <br /> use with an LDL Model CAL200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the <br /> measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National <br /> Standards Institute. <br /> Vehicle pass-by measurements were conducted by programming the noise level meters with <br /> appropriate exceedance thresholds. Specifically, any single-event which caused noise levels <br /> received at the microphone to exceed 70 dBA for a period of 5 or more seconds was logged as <br /> a separate single-event exceedance in the memory of the noise meter. On the three nights <br /> during which BAC staff conducted observations between the hours of 9 pm and 1 am, <br /> exceedance data was logged and correlated with the BAC staff observations pertaining to the <br /> vehicle or vehicles which caused the exceedance. Specifically, the type of vehicle, direction, <br /> and general observations on the speed of the vehicles were noted. <br /> According to truck logs kept by George Reed, Inc., 559 nighttime truck loads were generated <br /> during the time BAC's noise meter was in place at Site 2. Because each load represents two <br /> trips (1 trip leaving full and 1 returning empty), a total of 1,118 heavy trucks associated with the <br /> delivery of asphalt from the Munn & Perkins plant passed by BAC's noise meter during the <br /> monitoring program. However, a total of 1,928 separate exceedances were recorded by the <br /> noise monitor during this same period. This indicates that only 58% of the measured <br /> exceedances were potentially caused by Munn & Perkins-related heavy trucks. In addition, <br /> BAG staff observed several Munn & Perkins heavy truck pass-bys with noise emissions too low <br /> to trigger an exceedance, further reducing the percentage of exceedances which could have <br /> been caused by Munn & Perkins trucks. <br />