Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> t <br /> 15 April 2009 <br /> AGE-NC-09-1683 <br /> Page 18 of 18 <br /> 13.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities. The findings were based on field <br /> testing results. Evaluations of the hydrogeologic conditions at the site for the purpose of this <br /> investigation were made from a limited number of available data points (i.e. test holes and ground <br /> water samples)and subsurface conditions may vary away from these data points.No other warranty, <br /> expressed or implied,is made as to the professional interpretations,opinions and recommendations <br /> contained in this report. <br /> 14.0. REFERENCES <br /> Azure Environmental, 2007, Case Closure Summary Report(2448 Kettleman Lane). <br /> California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, 1966, Geologic Map of <br /> California. <br /> California Irrigation Management Information System(C1MIS), 2009, (www.cimis.water.ca.gov). <br /> Neil O. Anderson and Associates (NOA), 1999, Soil Suitability/Nitrate Loading Study(340 West <br /> State Highway 12). <br /> The San Joaquin County Community Development Department, 2008 aerial photograph, <br /> (wEw.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/commdev). <br /> I <br /> The San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, 2008, Ground Water <br /> Report-Fall 2008 . <br /> The United States Department of Agriculture, 1992, Soil Survey of San Joaquin County, California. <br /> Western Regional Climate Center, 2009, (w)yw.wrcc.dri.edu). <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />