My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002207_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
340
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-99-02
>
SU0002207_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:46:23 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:25:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0002207
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-99-02
STREET_NUMBER
340
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95240
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
340 W HWY 12
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\HWY 12\340\UP-99-02\SU0002207\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 19, 1999 <br /> Job Number: S99303 <br /> Page 9 <br /> lfany large gathering'or event is'planned for the winery that.may exceed the daily <br /> usage estimate, the use of pai- table chemical toilets for those events or periods zs <br /> recommended. <br /> 4) : The design ofthe se <br /> ptic.-system should follow.the San Joaquin-Count" "Sewage <br /> Standards" criteria- 1 <br /> 5) The on-site well should be tested(currently non-functioning}before.use with the <br /> E.. <br /> ,. winery project and,public consumption- If nitrates, DBCP or other contaminates <br /> are found to exceed:the maximum contaminate limits,our office should be notified. <br /> Based on the results of this study, we believe the soils in the proposed leach.field area are <br /> satisfactory for use of anon-site septic system. Provided our recommendations are followed, we <br /> do not believe that the proposed project will negatively impact ground water quality. <br /> IX; L•IMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions'of this'report are.based on the inforrimation provided regarding the <br /> existing and.proposed development, the use of the subject property" and the site conditi n <br /> s as i <br /> they existed.at the time we excavated.our test hole and performed the percolation test. It was <br /> assumed that the test hole and percolation test results are representative of the subsurface <br /> conditions in the general area: <br /> Our professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions <br /> proposed in accordance with <br /> p generally accepted,engineering principles and practices. This <br /> warranty is in lieu of-all other warranties either expressed or implied.- Testfindings and <br /> t statements of professional opinion do'not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed'or j <br /> r implied <br /> � „ 1 <br /> r � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.