Laserfiche WebLink
k- KLEINFELDER <br /> After the first 30 minutes, the drop in water level in test hole #2 was measured in <br /> approximate 10-minute intervals (SJCEHD Procedure #3) for the next 30 minutes. <br /> The test procedure changed because the prescribed amount of water seeped out of <br /> the hole in less than the 30-minute interval. After 30 minutes, procedure #2 was <br /> resumed because the seepage slowed enough to allow this procedure. Under the <br /> observation of a representative from the SJCEHD, the last 30-minute readings of the <br /> four-hour period were used to calculate the percolation rate in minutes per inch. The <br /> SJCEHD representative approved the test results for the percolation test hole P-2. A <br /> copy of our field percolation test result is attached on Plate 7. (� J <br /> On August 28, 2007,,-sample�of groundwater were obtained using clean procedures 3� <br /> -r from a well located site. A permit for the well was not on file with SJCEHD. <br /> The water sample ained from the well were delivered to a laboratory on ice that ( s� <br /> same day using chain-of-custody procedures for DBCP testin <br /> We-boring an percolation test holes were located in the field by visual sighting and/or <br /> pacing from existing site features; therefore, the locations shown on Plate 2 should be <br /> considered approximate. <br /> 6. GROUNDWATER <br /> Groundwater was not encountered in the soil profile boring drilled for this investigation. <br /> Lines of Equal Depth to Groundwater contour maps published in groundwater reports <br /> by the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (1981 to : <br /> 1999) show groundwater levels in the project area ranging from about 10 to 20 feet <br /> below ground surface. Based on Lines of Equal Elevation of Groundwater contour <br /> maps, the groundwater gradient in the project area is generally from east to west. <br /> Local gradient variations may occur due to well usage. <br /> We understand that the existing well on the property will be used to supply water for <br /> the new facility. No new wells are planned. <br /> The results of the groundwater a to determine the concentrations of nitrate (N) <br /> in the water sampled from t' <br /> e on-sit well indicated a non-detectable concentration <br /> with a reporting limit of 0.10 mg is nitrate concentration is below the state drinking <br /> water standard of 10 mg/l. The results of the groundwater analysis to determine the <br /> concentrations of DBCP in the water sampled from the on-site well indicated a non- 611� <br /> detectable concentration with a reporting limit of 0.0050 pg/l. Copies of the test results <br /> and the chain-of-custody are presented on Plate 8. <br /> We do not know of any existing and/or potential groundwater contamination issues in <br /> the project vicinity. There are no existing gas stations or dairies adjacent to the <br /> property. Seasonal fertilization of the off-site agricultural land, if performed, and other <br /> 81538.G011STO713801 October 4,2007 <br /> ©2007 Kleinfelder Page 3 of 5 <br />