My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006503_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
5484
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0700125
>
SU0006503_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:46:25 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:26:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006503
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0700125
STREET_NUMBER
5484
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
APN
05516023 24 25
ENTERED_DATE
4/3/2007 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
5484 W HWY 12
RECEIVED_DATE
4/3/2007 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\HWY 12\5484\PA-0700125\SU0006503\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY '' <br /> r., Z ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3 Floor Stockton-CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420 -Fax: (209)464-0138 • Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.u8/ehd <br /> �a�i Q�tiz <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PA#: 07-125(UP) <br /> SITE LOCATION: 5184 W.Hwy.12,LOD1 <br /> REPORT DATE: 1014!2007 <br /> = sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ® ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ® ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> N ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> ® ❑ 2.2 Descriptionidiscussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ® ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> f to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> N ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> N [❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> N ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate formulalmodel,if applicable. <br /> ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells,rivers,lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ® ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ® ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> N ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ® ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> a <br /> Reviewed By: Michael F. Escotto Reviewed Date: 11/ /2008 <br /> EHD 26-02-002 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br /> c <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.