My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002670
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
8751
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-99-41
>
SU0002670
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:48:10 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:27:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002670
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-99-41
STREET_NUMBER
8751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
VICTOR
ENTERED_DATE
10/31/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8751 E HWY 12
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\HWY 12\8751\SA-99-41\SU0002670\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
%"../ <br /> ' oP4u''N..�o SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> . -�.,.P.• 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE.,sTOCKTON,CA 95205-6232 <br /> C4' -:::.•Vii` PHONE;2091468-3121 FAX:2691468-3163 June 4, 1998 <br /> �lFOA <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Development Committee <br /> FROM Kai Luoma �C/ <br /> Assistant Planner 54- / a <br /> SUBJECT: SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION NO. SA-99-41 OF <br /> DOLE FRESH FRUITS (CIO R. LAWSON ENTERPRISES) <br /> -------------------------------------------------- <br /> The applicant has submitted the above referenced application to replace a 30,964 square foot <br /> legal non-conforming packing shed with a legal non-conforming winery. An existing brining <br /> facility, cold storage facility, and a fruit packing and storage operation located at the site are to <br /> remain. The project site is located on the north side of State Route 12, Victor. <br /> This item is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on July 1, 1999. The <br /> Community Development Department has reviewed the proposed Use Permit and has <br /> determined that several issues need to be addressed before the Community Development <br /> Department can complete its review and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. <br /> ■ Intensity of use: Section 9-235.3(c) of the Development Title states of legal non-conforming <br /> uses "A change shall be allowed only if the Review Authority finds that the proposed use is <br /> less detrimental to, or will have no greater impact in, the zone than the existing non- <br /> conforming use." In general, the Food Manufacturing use type, under which wineries are <br /> classified, is a more intensive use type than Preparation Services, under which packing <br /> sheds are classified, and therefore, may likely have a greater impact. <br /> The applicant maintains that this specific winery use, not the proposed use type (Food <br /> Manufacturing), will be less detrimental than the existing packing shed. This position is <br /> based on the claims that the winery will have fewer employees and will generate less <br /> wastewater than the packing shed. Though intensity of a use is not based solely on the <br /> number of employees and amounts of wastewater produced, the Community Development <br /> Department determined that the intensity of this proposed winery, as presented in the <br /> application, is approximately equal to that of the packing shed. <br /> The applicant has indicated to staff that the winery may expand its operation in the future. <br /> This would not be permitted, as any increase to the proposed facility, when combined with <br /> the existing brining, packing, and storage facilities, would exceed the intensity of the <br /> packing shed, and therefore, not comply with the Development Title. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.