SU0007710_SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1� .r tiahtornia Home Fletaartmen7 'it P,esnr loe Requiatmi, seeirchi .�)ntact Fos '13ackxo Administrative Enforcement Actions. o Structural Disciplinary Review Committee Decisions Final Enforcement Orders ■ new Robert Hughes-Bloom's Landscape Maintenance, Docket No. 140 (County File No. 040-ACP-PLA-05/06) Robert Hughes-Bloom's Landscape Maintenance appealed to the Director from a civil penalty decision of the Placer County Agricultural Commissioner. The Director upheld the commissioner's finding that the appellant had committed violations of 3 CCR sections 6602, 6724, 6726, 6738(b)(1)(C); by its employee not possessing a pesticide label when applying the pesticide; by not providing documentation that the employee had been trained in pesticide handling;that the employee did not have emergency medical information available; and that the employee was not wearing eye protection when applying a pesticide with hand-held equipment (a backpack sprayer). The commissioner imposed a total penalty of$2,400 for the six vioiations (the appellant stipulated to two of the six violations); however,the appellant did not contest the fine. Upon review of the record,the Director upheld the commissioner's decision in its entirety. The decision became final on January 10, 2007. ■ S&S Helicopters, Docket No. 137 (County File No. 17-ACP-MAD-05/06) S & S Helicopters appealed to the Director from a civil penalty decision of the Madera County Agricultural Commissioner. The fine levied by the commissioner was$3,000. The Director dismissed the appeal and directed the commissioner to withdraw its decision and order. Due to a technical malfunction, the commissioner was unable to produce a record of the hearing that was sufficient to conduct the appeal The Director's decision became final on November 1, 2006. ■ NEw Charles S. Moseslan -Moseslan Vineyards, Docket No. 135(County File No. 05-ACP-MAD-04/05) Charles S. Mosesian -Mosesian Vineyards (Mosesian), appealed to the Director from a civil penalty decision of the Madera County Agricultural Commissioner. Upon review of the record,the Director upheld the Commissioner's finding that Mosesian violated four sections of Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations. The Director found that Mosesian failed to: display at a central location its application-specific information for its employees that handled pesticides (3 CCR section 6723.1(a)): assure that training was completed before its employee was allowed to handle pesticides (3 CCR section 6724(d)); assure that its employee had one pint of water immediately available for emergency eye flushing (3 CCR section 6734(c)), and;display at a central location its application-specific information for its employees that worked in the fields (3 CCR section 6761.1(a)). The fine levied by the Commissioner was $1,050. The Director's decision became final on November 8, 2006 ■ NEw Continental landscape, Inc., , Docket No. 134 (County File No. 05/05-ACP-AMA) Continental Landscape, Inc. appealed to the Director from a civil penalty decision of the Amador County Agricultural Commissioner, The Director upheld the Commissioner's finding of a violation of Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations (3 CCR), section 6678, based on the appellant's failure to properly label a backpack sprayer. The Director overturned the CommisEionef'S finding of violations of 3 CCR sections 6738(b)(1)(C)and (c)(1)(C)for falling to assufe that employees;More personal protective equipment. The portion of the fine levied by the commissioner that was upheld on appeal is$400. The Director's decision became final on December 11, 2006 ■ G &S Farms, Docket No. 132 (County File No, 025-ACP-SB-05/06) G & S Farms appealed to the Director from a civil penalty decision of the Santa Barbara County Agricultural Commissioner. The Director upheld the commissioner's finding of a violation of FAC section 12973 , based on the appellant's failure to maintain legible warning signs throughout the restricted entry interval as required by permit. The fine levied by the commissioner was $250. The Director's decision became final on September 11, 2006. ■ Trinkle Ag Flying, Inc., Docket No. 129(County File No. 001-ACP-SJ-05/06) Trinkle Ag Flying appealed to the Director from a civil penalty decision of the San Joaquin County Agricultural Commissioner, The Director upheld the commissioner's finding of two violations of California Code of Regulations, Title 3, section 6600(e), based on the appellant's failure to exercise reasonable precaution to avoid contamination of the environment.The fine levied by the commissioner was$2,000. L The Director's decision became final on June 23, 2006 V ngUQ Q PGttS j n car V NOT NO TKQU�S . � 3,3 �`��r on Q re k-v o r.