SU0004217 SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

March 19, 2004 NOA Project Number: E0415A ,, Page 10 l Soil Factor(SF): 0.250. Leach Line (LL): 1,375 gal x 0.250=344 Liner Feet of LL. Since one(1) 36-in seepage pit is ` equivalent to 70-feet o each line, the use of three seepage pits would be equivalent to 210 feet �d (3 x 70 feet). Therefore, the se ti s stem ould be confi 45 i with three 6-inch diameter see a e Isis an example of how the system could be laid t„ out. The actual septic system layout should be performed by the e praoiect Eneineer or by EHD 7 staff. The septic system design is not part of this scope of work., 3 7.0 NITRATE LOADING ANALYSIS Because of the concern of nitrate leaching into ground water from septic systems, a nitrate •■ loading analysis was required by the San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division(PHS-EHD) for the proposed facility to measure the potential concentration of percolating effluent and rain fall over the long term. Where percolating effluent leaches into the ground, ground water quality may be impacted to some degree should the effluent reach ground water. The method utilized for the nitrate loading analysis is based on a simple mass balance formula, discussed in a published article by Hantzsche and Finnemore (1992) which provides a convenient and simplified method to estimate long-term ground-water nitrate impacts on an area-wide basis. Hantzsche and Finnemore found that over a long period of time,water quality in the upper saturated ground-water zone closely approximates the quality of percolating recharge waters. They believe that their method is a good planning tool and provides useful information to planners and local officials but with some real limitations. In their article published in Ground Water, Hantzsche and Finnemore mention that "...the equation ignores dispersion, lateral flow, and mixing with ground water flow from up-gradient areas. These processes would generally contribute to additional reduction of nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in ground water to the extent that the nitrate-nitrogen concentration of ground-water flow from up-gradient areas is lower." The Hantzsche and Fennemore approach is "...a conservative (worst case) first approximation of �. ground-water nitrate-nitrogen concentration resulting from the combined effect of on-site sewage disposal systems and precipitation. This (the equation and approach) is for estimation of long-term effect (i.e., over years) on ground-water quality, and is not intended for prediction of �- seasonal changes" (Hantzsche and Finnemore, 1992). The method takes into account development area, soil denitrification factor,rainfall volume, rainfall nitrate concentration, the waste effluent quantity, and waste effluent nitrate concentration. The formula, assumptions and calculations used for the analysis are shown on Plates 2 through 4. The units of nitrate used in the mass balance equation are nitrate-N whose maximum drinking water contaminant level is 10 mg/L.