SU0008325 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

sanitation, water supply, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been provided for the Project, and the proposed improvements are properly related to existing and proposed roadways; that issuance of the conditional use permit required for the Project will not be significantly detrimental to the public health,safety, or welfare, or be injurious to the property or improvements of adjacent properties; and that the proposed use is compatible with adjoining land uses; and WHEREAS, the County Board of Supervisors received one(1)timely appeal from the law firm of Abbot&Kindermann, LLP on behalf of Pilot-Flying J, Inc. with respect to the Planning Commission's certification of the Final EIR, approval of the Findings of Fact and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the Project; and WHEREAS, the appeal was set for hearing before the Board on February 12, 2013; and WHEREAS, the County Board of Supervisors considered the appeal at a duly noticed hearing on February 12,2013; and WHEREAS, during this hearing the Board considered the Draft FIR, Final EIR, and all evidence presented both orally and in writing; and WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed the Final EIR in its entirety and has determined that the document reflects the independent judgment of the County; and WHEREAS, the Board has studied the proposed Project and Final EIR and considered all public comments on the Project; and WHEREAS,all of the findings and conclusions made by the County pursuant to this Resolution are based upon the oral and written evidence presented to the County as a whole and not based solely on the information provided in this Resolution;and WHEREAS,the Final EIR is deemed legally and factually adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Project; and WHEREAS,none of the verbal and written comments submitted by Pilot to the Planning Commission and the Board identified new significant environmental impacts or significant new information beyond that already identified and analyzed in the EIR for the Project; and WHEREAS,among the grounds for Pilot's appeal were contentions that the analyses of traffic and air quality impacts in the Final EIR were inadequate; and WHEREAS,the Board, in reviewing the Final FIR, has reviewed the responses to comments made by Pilot in its letter on the Draft EIR dated November 13, 2012, and has concluded that the responses are legally adequate and that the traffic and air quality analyses challenged by Pilot are adequate and supported by substantial evidence; and 3