My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004625 SSCRPT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TULLY
>
16848
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0400476
>
SU0004625 SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:59 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:45:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SU0004625
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0400476
STREET_NUMBER
16848
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
TULLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
APN
05303010
ENTERED_DATE
9/2/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
16848 N TULLY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/30/2004 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\TULLY\16848\PA-0400476\SU0004625\SSC RPT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Questions and Answers Relating to the Wt Lamson Act Page 3 of 4 <br /> ... ..e <br /> operations on the subject contracted parcel or parcels or on the other contracted lands in agricultural <br /> preserves. Uses that significantly displace agricultural operations on the subject contracted parcel or <br /> _ parcels may be deemed compatible if they relate directly to the production of commercial agricultural <br /> products on the subject contracted parcel or parcels or neighboring lands,including activities such as <br /> harvesting,processing,or shipping." <br /> (3) "The use will not result in the significant removal of adjacent contracted land from agricultural or <br /> open space use." <br /> 12.What method of valuation will be used to value land if a contract is entered into? <br /> Section 423 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that lands which are subject to an enforceable restriction shall be <br /> valued by the capitalization income method. The capitalization rate shall not be derived from sales data and shall be the <br /> sum of three components which are: (1)the interest component,(2)a risk component,and(3)a property tax component. <br /> In addition,the lowest of three valuations is enrolled: (1)restricted value,(2)factored base year value,or(3)current <br /> market value. <br /> 13.Will property owners be required to provide any basis for assessments based on agricultural value? <br /> Yes. The Assessor will require that the owner file an income statement for the land in question for each year. <br /> Questionnaires are sent to owners annually in most jurisdictions. <br /> 14.Are there any zoning requirements? <br /> Most cities and counties require that land subject to a contract be zoned with an agricultural designation consistent with <br /> General Plan policy. <br /> 15.What are the land uses permitted within an Agricultural Preserve? <br /> _ The rules of each Agricultural Preserve will specify the uses that will be permitted therein. Generally,any commercial <br /> agricultural use will be permitted within any Agricultural Preserve. In addition,local governments may identify <br /> compatible uses permitted within an Agricultural Preserve. <br /> 16.Can the contract be canceled? <br /> Only the landowner can petition a local government to cancel a contract.Cancellation(i.e.,immediate cessation of the <br /> contract)must be based on specific findings that are supported by substantial evidence,and can take place only after a <br /> public hear-ing and a determination by the Board or Council that the specific findings can be met. <br /> The existence of an opportunity for another use of the property is not sufficient reason for cancellation.In addition,the <br /> uneconomic character of an existing agricultural use shall not,by itself,be sufficient reason for cancellation of the <br /> contract. <br /> 17.How have courts interpreted cancellation provisions? <br /> The Supreme Court has stated that cancellation is not appropriate where the objectives served by the cancellation could be <br /> served by nonrenewal,(See Sierra Club v City of Hayward(1981)28 Cal.3d 840, 852-853). Cancellation is reserved for <br /> unusual,"emergency" situations. Therefore,the nine-year nonrenewal process has been identified as the legally preferred <br /> method for terminating a Williamson Act contract. <br /> http://www.co.humboldt.ca.us/planning/brochure/william.htm 5/12/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.