Laserfiche WebLink
FALL CREEK <br /> REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE F.NGTNF.F.RTNG.INC. <br /> o. <br /> .. Wastewater Quantity and IDS Concentration. The total volume of process wastewater <br /> estimated for the facility used in the analysis based on future production levels estimated at 0.5 <br /> `• millions gallons per year. The average IDS concentration from the treatment wetland is assumed <br /> to be 660 mg/L. This value was used based on average IDS values measured at other Central <br /> %W Valley Wineries(700 mg/L) and adjusted slightly to account for expected percent removal of <br /> ♦„ sodium and potassium in the treatment wetland. Although, Kadlec and Knight(1996)report <br /> percent removal rates for sodium and potassium at approximately 9 and 45 percent,respectively, <br /> FCE assumed sodium and potassium removal rates of 5 and 30 percent, respectively. <br /> %W Storm Water Quantity and IDS Concentration. The total volume of storm water runoff that <br /> %W will enter the wetland and enter the land disposal area for both average annual and 100-year <br /> rainfall years was used in the mass-balance calculations and equal to approximately 0.52 and <br /> 0.92 million gallons per year, respectively. Virtually no data is published IDS concentrations in <br /> �- storm water runoff, so FCE assumed that the IDS concentration in the storm water runoff is 160 <br /> `. mg/L,which is equivalent to low strength wastewater reported by Metcalf&Eddy(2003). <br /> Direct Rainfall Quantity and IDS Concentration. The total volume of direct rainfall that falls <br /> on both the wetland and land disposal areas was also included in the analysis. The IDS <br /> �. concentration was assumed to be 40 mg/L based on rainfall data reported by Hem(1985). <br /> `. Evaporation Volume. Over the course of the year a substantial volume of water in the wetlands <br /> will be lost that could potential result in concentrating IDS in the wetland. FCE accounted for <br /> `w this loss in the calculation by subtracting the volume of water loss to evapo-transpiration in the <br /> %W wetland. <br /> The results of the mass-balance calculations are summarized in Table 5.6. <br /> %W Table 5.6. Estimated Inorganic Dissolved Solids Applied to Land Disposal Area <br /> `, Inorganic Dissolved Solids Concentrations <br /> Water Year m <br /> Average Water Year Conditions(18.1 in/yr) 371 <br /> %1W Wet Water Year Conditions(33 in/yr) 266 <br /> The results indicate that under the current level of operation the discharge of inorganic dissolved <br /> solids will be relatively low and lower. Further reduction of IDS is expected to occur due to <br /> %AW plant uptake of potassium in the wastewater and from natural cation exchange capacity of the <br /> `, soils. <br /> 5.5 Conclusions <br /> Summarizing our analysis of the proposed wetland system at Jessie's Grove Winery: <br /> • The proposed storm water facility is sufficiently sized to contain runoff and direct rainfall <br /> %W resulting from the average annual and 100-year annual rainfall year. <br /> JESSIE'S GROVE WINERY 26 FEBRUARY 2004 <br />