Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion of Nitrate Loading Results <br /> Total Nitrate Impact <br /> Based on the method and assumptions described, the result of the nitrate loading <br /> estimate indicates that the existing and proposed residences and proposed <br /> devel engin the Site have the tential to cause a buildup of nitrates in the aquifer <br /> above 10 mg/L-N up to 14.68 m6141- . The small property size and the over estimation <br /> of customer-and emplov� has caused the nitrate loading estimate to be above 10 <br /> mg/L-N. <br /> We believe that the aquifer below the site will not likely experience the estimated <br /> buildup of nitrate due to the conservative assumptions this model utilizes and for the �) <br /> following reasons: <br /> 1. The facility will likely not see up to 20 winery customers per day, 7 days per <br /> week, 12 months per year. It is our opinion that the level may actually be one <br /> or two customers per day average over the entire year. The owner indicated <br /> that most of the time, only one or two staff will be working; these are the same <br /> people living onsite already. Taking into consideration these factors, the <br /> resulting Nc value would be reduced from 14.68 to 10.6 m /g L,N. <br /> 2. Mixing_ of_the percolating effluent with ground water tends to dilute the <br /> concentration_an_d greatly reduces potential buildup of nitrogen. The <br /> percolation rate of 42 minutes per inch is a relatively slow rate and will tend to <br /> keep the moisture near the surface longer so evaporation and plant <br /> transpiration will uptake the nutrients and moisture, especially during the <br /> warm months. (IJP„ / ,(. , _ -/- -• e-! 1 ) <br /> 3. Ground water in the area is not known to have been impacted significantly by <br /> percolating septic system effluent. Nitrate was detected in the sample from <br /> the on-site well at a concentration of 16.9 mg/L-NO3 (equivalent to 3.6 mg/L- <br /> N). <br /> 4. If an oversized septic tank were utilized.for the new winery bathroom, the tank <br /> would allow greater waste-water retention that would promote the biologic <br /> treatment of waste water, improving effluent water quality. Studies by the <br /> industry and other informal studies within the county by EHD staff and <br /> consultants have shown this to be a very cost effective way to improve <br /> treatment. The oversized septic tank will improve overall water quality of the <br /> percolating effluent when compared to a tank that was sized using traditional <br /> methods. <br /> LOGE1013 Page 13 <br />