Laserfiche WebLink
Management Measures for Agricultural Sources- Facility Wastewater and Runoff- Large Confined Ani... Page 4 of 8 <br /> with the nutrient management measure. <br /> The size limitations that define a large unit are based on EPA's analysis of the economic <br /> achievability of the management measure. <br /> 4. Effectiveness information <br /> The effectiveness of management practices to control contaminant losses from confined livestock <br /> facilities depends on several factors including: <br /> • The contaminant(s)to be controlled and their likely pathways in surface, subsurface, and <br /> ground-water flows; <br /> • The types of practices(section 5) and how these practices control surface, subsurface, and <br /> ground-water contaminant pathways; and <br /> • Site-specific variables such as soil type, topography, precipitation characteristics, type of <br /> animal housing and waste storage facilities, method of waste collection, handling and <br /> disposal, and seasonal variations. The site-specific conditions must be considered in system <br /> design, thus having a large effect on practice effectiveness levels. <br /> The gross effectiveness-estimates reported in Table 2-9 simply indicate summary literature values. <br /> For specific cases, a wide range of effectiveness can be expected depending on the value and <br /> interaction of the site-specific variables cited above. <br /> When runoff from storms up to and including the 24-hour, 25-year frequency storm is stored, there <br /> will be no release of pollutants from a confined animal facility via the surface runoff route. Rare <br /> storms of a greater magnitude or sequential storms of combined greater magnitude may produce <br /> runoff, however. Table 2-10 reflects the occurrence of such storms by indicating less than 100 <br /> percent control for runoff control systems. <br /> 5. Confined Animal Facility Management Practices <br /> As discussed more fully at the beginning of this chapter and in Chapter 1, the following practices <br /> are described for illustrative purposes only. State programs need not require implementation of <br /> these practices. However, as a practical matter, EPA anticipates that the management measure <br /> set forth above generally will be implemented by applying one or more management practices <br /> appropriate to the source, location, and climate. The practices set forth below have been found by <br /> EPA to be representative of the types of practices that can be applied successfully to achieve the <br /> management measure described above. <br /> Combinations of the following practices can be used to satisfy the requirements of this <br /> management measure. The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) practice number and definition <br /> are provided for each management practice, where available. Also included in italics are SCS <br /> statements describing the effect each practice has on water quality (USDA-SCS, 1988). <br /> • a. Dikes (356): An embankment constructed of earth or other suitable materials to <br /> protect land against overflow or to regulate water. <br /> Where dikes are used to prevent water from flowing onto the floodplain, the pollution dispersion <br /> effect of the temporary wetlands and backwater are decreased. The sediment, sediment-attached, <br /> and soluble materials being transported by the water are carried farther downstream. The final fate <br /> of these materials must be investigated on site. Where dikes are used to retain runoff on the <br /> floodplain or in wetlands the pollution dispersion effects of these areas may be enhanced. <br /> Sediment and related materials may be deposited, and the quality of the water flowing into the <br /> http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/MMGI/Chapter2/ch2-2bl.html 2/6/2009 <br />