My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005751
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
U
>
UNDINE
>
4000
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500729
>
SU0005751
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:44 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:52:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005751
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500729
STREET_NUMBER
4000
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
UNDINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
APN
19107017
ENTERED_DATE
11/3/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4000 W UNDINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/24/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\U\UNDINE\4000\PA-0500729\SU0005751\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\U\UNDINE\4000\PA-0500729\SU0005751\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\U\UNDINE\4000\PA-0500729\SU0005751\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\U\UNDINE\4000\PA-0500729\SU0005751\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 04 06 09:49a Community Development 2099417270 p.24 <br /> r City of <br /> Planning Division __... _ 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop, CA 95330 <br /> Phone(209).941-7290—fax(209) 941-7219 <br /> -: w�vur.ci;Iatfirop.ca.us <br /> April 27, 2006 <br /> Y . <br /> Kathy Allen <br /> Sari Joaquin County E{.' E 11l E D <br /> Community Development Department <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> MY <br /> Stockton,CA 95205 <br /> Ci7YATTORNEYt3 <br /> Subject: PA 050079-Olivera Family Partnership OFFICE <br /> Dear hos.Allen: <br /> The City of Lathrop has reviewed the proposed Negative Declaration for the Site Approval Application <br /> for a discretionary project consisting of (1) a poultry farm to be constructed in six phases over a period of <br /> six years;(2)a 5,200 square foot packing roorn and a 25,800 square foot Iaving house;and(3) subsequent <br /> phases encompassing four additional laying houses; totaling an additional 103,200 square feet resulting in <br /> a total of one million birds. <br /> Opposition to Negative Declaration and Objection to Project <br /> Based on this review, the City opposes the approval of the Negative Declaration and objects.to this <br /> poultry farm project on the ground that the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") will be <br /> violated if the Negative Declaration and project are approved by the San Joaquin County Planning <br /> Commission. Specifically, the proposed project will cause direct and cumulatively significant <br /> environmental impacts affecting water quality, drainage, water disposal, waste disposal, odors, and air <br /> quality. <br /> Factually,:the proposed poultry farm project is located adjacent to the San Joaquin River and across the <br /> river from the 4,900 acre River Islands project within the City. The River Islands project is an approved <br /> ►easter planned community projecting approximately 11,400 residences, schools, community parks, <br /> inland tivaterways and parks, and employment center. A poultry operation of this magnitude is no longer <br /> an agricultural use, but, as a confined animal feeding operation, is."an industrial operation" that would <br /> have a direct impact to City of Lathrop in general' and to the River Islands project in particular. <br /> Accordingly, the City of Lathrop strongly disputes the analysis and Conclusions of the Initial Study and <br /> Negative Declaration for the following reasons. <br /> First, reliance on the imposition of government regulations to mitigate potentially significant <br /> environmental impacts is no substitute for thorough analysis of the nature, scope and severity of <br /> environmental impacts, particularly with respect to air and water 'quality in this case. There is no <br /> quantitative comparison of the "before" and "after" environmental effects of a one million bird poultry <br /> farm, particularly with respect to air and water quality. Stated differently, there is no objective <br /> determination of the nature, scope and severity of environmental impacts potentially generating from this <br /> enormous project. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.