My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006059 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VALPICO
>
12100
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600207
>
SU0006059 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:32:04 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:54:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006059
PE
2627
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600207
STREET_NUMBER
12100
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VALPICO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
24014024
ENTERED_DATE
5/23/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
12100 W VALPICO RD
RECEIVED_DATE
5/23/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\V\VALPICO\12100\PA-0600207\SU0006059\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'OPqu1N.,c� <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 2 —* ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> z <br /> a •< <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, 3`d Floor, Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> P' Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> otRN� <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: PA#: D e— -20� LU to) <br /> /c�3 7J REPORT DATE: <br /> S = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 99--1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Des iption of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> (Yd-3) �q A} <br /> 9 El 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project sitz, ' <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS �� t4U <br /> [ ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> rr pp ;z <br /> ❑ 2.2 Description/dit�Usion of any epxis�tin�g gor po ential gr undwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. �.� <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected usegroundwater as related <br /> ct <br /> to the proposed development proje . tea, *' ( PR,,,e,� ( .,r�",w, J (ft 5)) <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contra tionf nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> �Q �6'W��popcC rtQe+u^ttSl� <br /> ❑ 32 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project sit $, C A^�) <br /> ® ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site urces of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project sit��4�(/ 611) <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site'sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site./Pr 11, <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loadin considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. (r 111) <br /> ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc{(, <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed projec(f6 j 7) <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or anv other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site 6V <br /> t 5) <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> �- ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professiona(�r[8) <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: n57i�s� Reviewed Date: 2 <br /> Etm 26-02 Pagel of 2 s.H.rti a sub Cnecxt st <br /> 7/142003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.