My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002185
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-00-24
>
SU0002185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2019 8:43:18 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:58:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002185
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-00-24
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
10/23/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\UP-00-24\SU0002185\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E <br /> Musca Olive Products - 3 - 12'June 2002 <br /> 2) Describe the criteria for determination of wastewater discharge to either the.Title 27 <br /> wastewater ponds or the land application system. For Figure 3, identify the disposal location <br /> for each waste stream.. <br /> 3) Table 3 presents 15t, 2"d, and 3`a processing rinses; the estimated volume includes a comment <br /> "each rinse;"is the total flow for the rinses 50,000 gal/day or some other number? Estimate <br /> the volume and present the chemical analyses for transport water,pitter water, accumulation <br /> water, floatation water, canning brine spillage, water softener regeneration brine, clean-in- <br /> place solutions, cooling tower blowdown, and boiler blowdown. <br /> 4) Table 17 presents a salt uptake rate of approximately 860-2,840 lbs/ac-year; Table 11 <br /> presents dissolved inorganic solids loading rate of 34,000 lbs/ac-year,provide a discussion <br /> of how the wastewater system protects groundwater quality. <br /> 5S6ctiori-11-1'd c§-cr'ibcs'disassociation of-bicarbo' nate ions insoiIb�sed-onsoil-pH `At-what_ - <br /> soil pH is the disassociation expected to occur? Is that soil pH anticipated to occur in the <br /> land application areas? <br /> 6) What are the-DIS and TDS effluent limits proposed by Musco for these WDRs? How will <br /> t water quality be protected with these values? ` <br /> 7) What is the flow rate (in weekly average and daily max)proposed by Musco for these <br /> revised WDRs? What is the anticipated flow rate in five years? <br /> 8) The water balance doesn't include stormwater runoff from the land application areas, Please <br /> address the omission and resubmit the water balance if necessary. Previous discussions with <br /> Mr. Hall indicated stormwater would be bypassed around the 114-million gallon pond based <br /> on some criteria. Is the bypass still planned? If so, describe the bypass system and proposed <br /> criteria for bypass of stormwater falling on the land application areas. <br /> 9) Provide an evaluation of the odor generation potential of the 114-million gallon and the <br /> 1-million gallon storage ponds. If mechanical aerators will be required, evaluate the <br /> horsepower required to maintain 1.0 mg/1 dissolved oxygen in the wastewater ponds. <br /> -10)- For each application area, describe how tailwater and stormwater are retained within the <br /> 6-- "" application areas'boundaries: Presentlhe-planneid locatibnofthe cul-l'ection'ditches;sumps, <br /> and pumping stations. <br /> 11) Section 11.3.2 describes application of wastewater during the winter to encourage leaching <br /> of salts so as not to hinder crop growth. It is noted that application of wastewater during <br /> rain events will likely be prohibited in the tentative WDRs. <br /> 12) Please provide the following clarifications: <br /> a. In Appendix I, Figures 4-1 and 4-2, locate the site on the drawings. <br /> b. In Appendix F, locate the site on the cross section. <br /> c. Appendix E, Figure 3 contains an apparent error on the number of acres. <br /> d. In Table 9, explain footnote "k." <br /> e. In Table 8, explain footnote "o" as nitrate or nitrogen. <br /> f. In Table 5, explain footnote "m" as nitrate or nitrogen. <br /> V,1San Joaquin_NonlSStaMObrirnTlMusco wJuae 2002�HaU 061202Aoc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.