SU0003046 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Recommendations Action It is recommended that the Planning Commission:; " : 1 . r� Deny.Site Approval Application No; SA-94-22 based on the inability to make.Findings No '1,°, 2, and 3.—V Findings for Site Approval - I 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, standards, and maps of the General Flan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific Pian. and Special Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. ' This Finding cannot be made because the proposed change in the nonconforming i use is a more intensive use than the previously approved nonconforming use and is therefore not consistent with provisions of the General Plan and Development Title that permit such changes only as long as the new nonconforming use is a less intensive use than the previous nonconforming use. There are no Master, Specific, ' or Special Purpose Plans affecting the site. The proposed use is consistent with the Findings of approval required by the State's Delta Protection Act of 1992. 2. Adequate utilities, roadway improvements.sanitation,water supply,drainage,and other necessary � I facilities have been provided. and the proposed improvements are properly related to existing and proposed roadways. • This Finding cannot be made because the proposed higher intensity use of the property does not leave enough room on the site to be in compliance with Public Health Services' minimum standards for the design and maintenance of on-site septic systems. The site's existing well was not installed under permit from and inspection by Public Health Services and will have to be abandoned and replaced with a new well. 3. The sate is physically suitable for the type of development and for the intensity of development. � • This Finding cannot be made because the proposed higher density use of the property does not conform to all applicable Devefopment Title regulations and requirements regarding minimum aisle widths and limits on outdoor storage. ; 4. Issuance of the permit will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be injurious to the property or improvements of adjacent properties. • This Finding can be made because the Initial Study prepared for SA-94-22 found that the project would not result in any significant, adverse environmental impacts. I i San voaquin Count, SA-94-22/Coulter �' ! Community Development ri _ Pace 8 _ '