Laserfiche WebLink
Soil and Groundwater Investigation Report and <br /> ` Second Quarter 2005 Monitoring and Sampling,US Can-Welty Road October 2005 <br /> is presented on Figures 5 and 6. Copies of the soil and groundwater chemical analytical reports with <br /> chain-of-custody documentation are included in Appendix F. <br /> 5.2.3 Investigation-Derived Waste <br /> Soil cuttings were stored in properly labeled 55-gallon, DOT-rated drums and stored at the site pending <br /> ` disposal by CEMC. The drums were removed on May 4, 2005 and transported from the site by Sturgeon <br /> & Sons,to the Altamont Landfill in Livermore, California. <br /> �- 6. WELL SEARCH RESULTS <br /> L In April 2004, SAIC conducted a search of DWR files to identify water supply wells within a 2,000-foot <br /> radius of the site. The water supply well search covered portions of Township 3-South; Range 4-East; <br /> sections 34 and 35. Three domestic wells(Figure 1, ID# 1, # 2, # 4) identified were located within the <br /> 2,000-foot radius;two of the domestic wells appear to be located up gradient of the former pipeline <br /> ROW, and one is located cross gradient to the inferred northeasterly groundwater flow direction. The <br /> well completion reports indicate the domestic wells were constructed with a minimum sanitary seal of 20 <br /> feet bgs. However,the well completion report for domestic well ID#4 did not state a well seal depth. <br /> Municipal or agricultural water supply wells were not formally identified during the April 2004 DWR <br /> search, yet,two wells(ID#5 and #6)were described as public wells and are located at the subject site. <br /> Both wells are sealed at 150 and 200 feet bgs, respectively. SAIC identified six monitoring wells, one <br /> ` groundwater extraction well, and one industrial well located within the 2000-foot radius. Six monitoring <br /> wells, one groundwater extraction well and one industrial well are located down gradient and cross <br /> gradient from the area of concern. The DWR water supply wells identified are presented on Figure 1 and <br /> summarized in Table 5. <br /> L <br /> 7. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL <br /> ` An equipment rinsate sample(QA-R)was collected from a clean, disposable bailer, and accompanied the <br /> samples in shipment to the laboratory, using laboratory-provided deionized water. The equipment blank <br /> sample was analyzed for BTEX, MTBE, TPHg,TPHd, and PAHs. All tested constituents were not <br /> detected with the exception of phenanthrene, which was detected at the laboratory detection limit of 0.01 <br /> ` lig/L. One trip blank sample(QA-T)accompanied the site samples in each shipment to the laboratory. <br /> The trip blank samples did not exhibit concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons(TPHg, BTEX, or <br /> MTBE)at or above the laboratory detection limits. Detailed descriptions and explanations are <br /> documented in the laboratory report included in Appendix F. <br /> S. WELL SURVEY <br /> On April 5, 2005, Morrow Surveying of West Sacramento, California(License# LS4650) surveyed all <br /> site monitoring wells. All wells were surveyed for vertical MSL elevations as well as for horizontal <br /> latitude and longitude coordinates, using APM GPS equipment. Well surveying and groundwater <br /> elevation data are presented in Table 6. Surveyor report is included in Appendix G. <br /> 9. WELL DEVELOPMENT <br /> On April 5, 2005 monitoring well MW-5 was developed. During the development of well MW-5, SAIC <br /> purged 10 well casing volumes of groundwater using a 2 inch-diameter disposable polyethylene bailer. <br /> ` During the purge process water-quality parameters(pH, specific conductance,and temperature) were <br /> recorded. Field data sheets are included in Appendix H. <br /> 7 From Science to Solutions- <br />