My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005344
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WOODBRIDGE
>
4620
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500531
>
SU0005344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:05:00 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 11:11:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005344
PE
2627
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500531
STREET_NUMBER
4620
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WOODBRIDGE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
01709002
ENTERED_DATE
8/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4620 E WOODBRIDGE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\W\WOODBRIDGE\4620\PA-0500531_PA-0300206\SU0005344\PUB REC REL APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM <br /> I. BACKGROUND <br /> A. Name of Proponent: State Water Resources Control Board, Bill Heredi ° <br /> B. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Division of Water Oualiry. 9011? Street 2nd Floor <br /> Sacramento CA 94244-2120 (916) 657-0570 <br /> C. Date Checklist Submitted: <br /> D. Agency Requiring Checklist: <br /> E. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for discharges_ <br /> to land from small domestic waste disposal systerns <br /> IL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br /> (Explanations are included on attached sheets). <br /> YES MAYBE NO <br /> I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. <br /> Would the proposal: <br /> Sa. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? 0 0 [�] <br /> b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies 0 0 (�] <br /> adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? <br /> c. Be incompatible with existing land use 0 0 (�] <br /> in the vicinity? <br /> d. Affect agriculture resources or 0 0 (f] <br /> operations(e.g.,impacts to soils or <br /> farmlands or impacts from incompatible <br /> land uses)? <br /> e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement 0 0 (�] <br /> of an established community(including a low- <br /> income or minority community)? <br /> 2. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. <br /> Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: <br /> a. Fault rupture? 0 0 [J] <br /> b. Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 (]] <br /> c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 141 <br /> d. Seiche, tsunami.or volcanic hazard? 0 0 [�] <br /> • e. Landslides or mud flows? 0 0 [�] <br /> -1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.