SU0007282 SSNL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ENVi-KONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMFivT 304 East Weber Avenue, 3rd Floor, Stockton, CA 95202-2708 Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd r NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST CATION: PA#: 4.3 .2 85 SITI� LO /// �f � ' 337 REPORT DATE: I = SuffInsufficentient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1 I = Insufficient S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils un� 44)a) } El 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying N constituent of concern identified for the project site. /j/ . A 6A'e_ 77, A4cz 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS Pja/It kiff /'00-11 I ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwat r, al fluctuations of grog - ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing r po n ' I groundwater co 15 I site. r f [� ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of grou water the site and of th i to the proposed development project V-g 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRA. [] 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and grog contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the j �.{� ® ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and grot re CaC-,"Lw7¢-CSC these sources to the project site. V] [❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soi load from these sources to the project site, / ® ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all pots Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applic ovE.e ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down g`raulel 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOS D METHOD OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL ❑ 4.1 Discussion.of total nitrate impact from proposed project. W?, ❑ ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and roundwater from urate, ' and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. 7J ��. orf ryL 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTIOk' AA t ®_', ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated andtamped bya uualifie environmental professional. X-TCA J 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: { a6 EXD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 s a+u 7/14/2003