Laserfiche WebLink
I. INTRODUCTION <br /> This report issues my investigative findings on the soil and groundwater under the subject property <br /> to properly design and specify operational criteria for a proposed commercial septic system. <br /> Mr. Mike Brown is the owner of the 5.9 acre subject property. He is proposing to install a mobile <br /> commercial coach office building along with a new septic system to serve this building. A three <br /> bedroom, two bath single family residence currently exists in the NEC of the triangular shaped <br /> parcel. The existing domestic well will serve both structures. <br /> Within the text of this Report, Bolded Section (§) numbers are referenced at the beginning of an <br /> applicable Paragraph(s), or Appendices that correspond with the EHD Requirements Checklist. <br /> Section Numbers referenced as SSS§, are sections applicable for the Soil Suitability Study <br /> Requirements Checklist. Section Numbers referenced as NLS§, are sections applicable for the <br /> Nitrate Loading Study Requirements Checklist. Other portions of text may also apply to other <br /> sections of the Checklists. <br /> NLS§ 2.3,($SS§3.1. As noted on the attached District Viewer map,the subject property is located <br /> near'the"intersection of the Hwy. 120 bypass and Interstate 5 in the southwest area of Lathrop. <br /> �SS§ 1.1, 1.2. As referenced,the property is 5.9 acres in size with completely fallow open area <br /> except for the residential structure and detached garage. Present land use is illustrated by the <br /> attached Google aerial photo. <br /> The following is a summarization of the information collected to complete this report. Wastewater <br /> system operational parameters are discussed in this report to supply required information to EHD: <br /> • The primary disposal area and the required 100%reserve/replacement area are described and <br /> calculated within. <br /> • Soil chemical testing was conducted on two samples retrieved from the four-foot percolation <br /> test boring. Physical testing of the soil included the actual percolation testing to determine <br /> particle size analysis correlated with permeability. Chemical testing included analyses for <br /> the constituents that influence nitrate loading. <br /> • The capacities of the on-site soils were analyzed for: 1.) The ability to accept future <br /> wastewater effluent flows from the commercial coach, 2.) To assess the characteristics of the <br /> on-site soils to mitigate nitrate impact, and 3.) To quantify nitrate impact potential to the <br /> underlying groundwater from percolating effluent, and 4.) Describe processes to mitigate <br /> nitrate loading. This was accomplished by the referenced testing and calculations. <br /> • The on-site domestic well was sampled and analyzed for the specific constituents of nitrate, <br /> and dibromochloropropane (DBCP) and ethylenedibromide (EDB), pursuant to San Joaquin <br /> County Environmental Health Department(EHD)requirements. <br /> 1 <br />