Laserfiche WebLink
m • Page 2 of 3 <br /> From: Emery, Kyle@CalRecycle <br /> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 4:42 PM <br /> To: Strough, Barbara@CalRecycle <Barbara.StroughgCalRecycle.ca.gov> <br /> Subject: Fwd: Complaint TPID 1302407 <br /> Hello Barbara, <br /> Received this email from San Joaquin for a complaint regarding the TPID <br /> seen below. The facility has already been inspected this cycle. I'm thinking <br /> that it should be because of the complaint and is consistent with the work <br /> plan instructions for non-priority inspections. What additional information <br /> should they include in the report, because they should not comment that a <br /> complaint has been filed with the facility. <br /> Thanks <br /> Kyle <br /> Begin forwarded message: <br /> From: "Harprit S. Mattu [EH]" <hmattu@sjcehd.com> <br /> Date: February 5, 2016 at 4:15:35 PM PST <br /> To: "'Emery, Kyle@CalRecycle"' <br /> <Kyle.Emery@calrec cl�a.gov> <br /> Subject: Complaint TPID 1302407 <br /> Hi Kyle, <br /> We received a complaint regarding one of our facilities, TPID <br /> 1302407 (see attached). This is an active facility. I wanted to <br /> obtain approval to conduct complaint inspection under this grant <br /> cycle. A routine inspection was conducted on 7/16/15. <br /> 11" F 0 r r o- n- n' <br /> file:///C:/Users/bescotto/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20... 2/9/2016 <br />