Laserfiche WebLink
5.1 AIR QUALITY <br /> emissions from combustion devices has historically been the use of best combustion <br /> practices. With the use of the dry low-NO,,combustors and with the duct burner emission <br /> level,VOC emissions will be limited to 2.0 ppmvd,corrected to 15 percent oxygen. Without <br /> duct firing,VOC emissions will be limited to 1.4 ppmvd,corrected to 15 percent oxygen. This <br /> level of emissions is consistent with the SJVAPCD's BACT guidelines for large gas turbines. <br /> BACT for VOC emissions for the auxiliary boiler will be achieved by the use of natural gas <br /> fuel and good combustion practices.The VOC emissions will be 10.0 ppmvd,corrected to <br /> 3 percent 02. SJVAPCD BACT Guideline 1.1.3 indicates that VOC BACT for boilers greater <br /> than 20 MMBtu/hr is natural gas fuel and good combustion practices. The low NOX burners <br /> are designed to minimize incomplete combustion and therefore minimize VOC emissions. <br /> PM10 BACT-For the turbine, duct burner and auxiliary boiler,BACT for PM10 is good <br /> combustion practices and the use of natural gas fuel,which will result in minimal particulate <br /> emissions. The turbine and HRSG will also utilize an air inlet filter and lube oil vent coalescer <br /> to minimize PM10 emissions. <br /> For the cooling tower, drift eliminators will be used to keep the drift rate below 0.0005%. This <br /> is the drift rate commonly achieved by cooling towers of this type and in combination with <br /> the proposed 3000 ppm limit on TDS in the cooling tower water,will minimize PM10 <br /> emissions from the cooling tower. <br /> SO2 BACT-SO2 emissions will be kept at a minimum by firing clean burning natural gas fuel <br /> with a maximum sulfur content of 1.0 gr/100 scf. <br /> In addition to the BACT requirements,SJVAPCD Rule 2201 requires the project to provide <br /> emission offsets when emissions exceed specified levels on a pollutant-specific basis. Offsets <br /> for CO are not required because the air quality impact analysis is expected to demonstrate to <br /> the satisfaction of the APCO that the ambient air quality standards for CO are not currently <br /> being violated and that the project would not cause or contribute to a violation of the <br /> standards (see Table 5.1-29). As shown in Table 5.1-44,the project must provide emission <br /> offsets for NO,PM10,SO2,and VOC emissions. <br /> TABLE 5.1-44 <br /> SJVAPCD Offset Requirements and Project Emissions <br /> Emissions from <br /> Existing Facility, Emissions from District Offset <br /> Pollutant tpy New Facility,tpy Threshold,tpy Offsets Required <br /> VOC 25.9 17.5 10.0 Yes <br /> NOX 20.4 71.5 10.0 Yes <br /> SO2 5.7 24.3 27.4 Yes <br /> PM10 8.8 44.0 14.6 Yes <br /> The NSR rule requires emission reductions to be provided at an offset ratio of between 1 and <br /> 1.5 to 1, depending upon the distance between the source and the offset location. <br /> Interpollutant offsets are permitted,at the discretion of the APCO. Appendix 5.1F presents a <br /> demonstration of compliance with the offset and mitigation requirements for the proposed <br /> project. The demonstration includes a listing of credits owned by the Applicant,a quarterly <br /> 5.1-68 SAC/371322/082410013(LEC_5.1_AIR_QUALITY.DOC) <br />