Laserfiche WebLink
Discharger is in violation of its odor control prohibition in its existing permit and likely to violate <br /> the same prohibition in its new permit. We suspect the Discharger is also in violation of the <br /> dissolved oxygen limit of 1 mg/l for the ponds. Daily testing for dissolved oxygen and pH (to <br /> reveal septic conditions) should be included in the permit to demonstrate compliance with the <br /> requirement of Pond Specifications C-2 and C-4. <br /> DeltaKeeper is concerned by the prospect of the Discharger expanding its irrigation area <br /> by 500 acres to the south of its current border. Approval of the increased acreage should be <br /> delayed until compliance is demonstrated. <br /> G. Monitoring for Biosolids. <br /> The Tentative Permits states that wet biosolids are currently handled by periodic blending <br /> with reclamation water and distributed via a ditch to fields for application by flood irrigation. <br /> DeltaKeeper is informed that,historically, the Discharger has collected supernate from the sludge <br /> lagoons and mixed it with reclamation water for irrigation. Periodically, sludge is dredged from <br /> the lagoons, dried and then land applied. The supemate contains high concentrations of metals and <br /> other priority pollutants. The Tentative Permit contains limits on land application concentration and <br /> loading rates. It is not clear that monitoring is required for the supemate. The Discharger will <br /> need to conduct flow monitoring if accurate pollutant loadings are to be calculated from the sludge <br /> lagoon supernate. DeltaKeeper believes that flow monitoring needs to be required for the wet <br /> biosolids that are blended with the reclamation water and distributed for application by flood <br /> irrigation. <br /> DeltaKeeper notes that Specification E-3 states that "[d]ischarge of waste classified as <br /> `hazardous' under Section 2521, Chapter 12 of Title 23 or `designated', as defined in Section, <br /> 13173 of California Water Code is prohibited." However,we could find no monitoring <br /> requirements that compel the Discharger to test the biosolids/sludge lagoon supernate for hazardous <br /> waste characteristics. How does the Regional Board intend to determine compliance with this <br /> limitation if testing is not conducted? The determination of hazardous waste characteristics and <br /> their soluble threshold limit concentrations (STLC)cannot be determined by priority pollutant <br /> analysis. The Discharger must perform a hazardous waste characterization test(STLC) on their <br /> biosolids/supemate. <br /> The literature reports that volatile acids increase when a digester experiences upsets and <br /> interference (becomes sour"). We recommend pH testing on the digestor supernate to detect <br /> upset/possible interference conditions in the digestor. When an upset condition is detected by a <br /> low pH reading,the Discharger should be required to test for priority,pollutants and hazardous <br /> waste characteristics (STLC) on the lagoon supemate nad wet biosolids. Again,testing is driven <br /> by conditions that have a reasonable potential to cause pollutant excursions. <br /> DeltaKeeper,Tentative NPDES Permit,Lodi, 17 December 1999,Page 12. <br />