My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:48:37 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1980-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Regional Board required the City of Stockton to employ continuous online devices to <br /> monitor dissolved oxygen,pH,temperature, electrical conductivity and turbidity in Smith Canal <br /> for dissolved oxygen problems similar to those found in White Slough. DeltaKeeper recommends <br /> that similar continuous monitoring be required for receiving water stations R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4. <br /> How frequently did the Discharger monitor during critical pre-dawn time frames? Did the <br /> Discharger monitor the dissolved oxygen sags following chemical weed control efforts? Has the <br /> Discharger made an effort to ascertain the effects of illegal dairy waste dumping? Relative to the <br /> amount of data obtained, the cost of continuous monitoring equipment is minimal. <br /> DeltaKeeper requests that the Regional Board require the Discharger to conduct metals <br /> and priority pollutant analyses concurrently with effluent metal and priority pollutant analyses. <br /> This would establish the effect of effluent discharges on receiving waters. Sample type (composite <br /> or grab) should be the same for effluent and receiving water sampling. This requirement should be <br /> clearly specified in the Receiving Water Monitoring section. Again,exceedances of a water quality <br /> standard should trigger a requirement for additional monitoring. <br /> J. Monitoring Wells. <br /> We are concerned that groundwater may be impaired below and around the holding <br /> ponds and sludge lagoons from percolation of pollutants from these locations. These ponds are the <br /> largest volume source of pollutants and have the longest holding times. Consequently, areas <br /> surrounding the holding ponds and sludge lagoons have the greatest exposure. DeltaKeeper <br /> requests that additional monitoring wells be located immediately adjacent to the holding ponds and <br /> sludge lagoons on the down-gradient side. <br /> K. Priority Pollutants. <br /> The Tentative Permit lacks a technical description defining priority pollutants. Does the <br /> phrase priority pollutants mean all pollutants listed in the National Toxics Rule or all pollutants <br /> listed in the California Toxics Rule or all priority pollutants listed under 503 of the Clean Water <br /> Act? Does priority pollutants as defined in the Tentative Permit include MTBE or tributyltin? We <br /> believe the Discharger should sample for all pollutants that have an established water quality <br /> standard, as listed in the National Toxics Rule. When the California Toxics Rule is enacted all <br /> additional pollutants (if any)should be included. <br /> "Priority pollutants" sampling should be conducted for four consecutive days on a <br /> quarterly basis. This would provide more accurate data to determine compliance with loading for <br /> four day averaging criteria. Should any pollutant be found to exceed a water quality standard, the <br /> Discharger should be required to re-sample within 30 days for that pollutant and report the results <br /> DeltaKeeper,Tentative NPDES Permit,Lodi, 17 December 1999,Page 14. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.