My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:48:37 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1980-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr . Fran Forkas <br /> January 13, 1989 <br /> Page 3 <br /> on Table 2 . It is particularly evident during the period that <br /> well 20-16B was monitored. The westerly hydraulic gradient <br /> evident in Table 2 may be a localized effect of the pits to <br /> the west of the plant from which soil was excavated for <br /> construction of Route 5 . <br /> Figure 3 is a site plan of the treatment plant facilities . <br /> Shown on the figure are the proposed locations of the <br /> monitoring wells . <br /> MONITORING WELLS <br /> A minimum of four wells are required for groundwater <br /> monitoring. <br /> One well is required for sampling upgradient, or <br /> background, water quality and three are required downgradient <br /> for water quality at the points of compliance. The <br /> recommended locations for these wells are shown on Figure 3 . <br /> wells WSMO1 would beuseWSM04 wabeguseddtoater monitorptheg and <br /> Wells WSM02 throughouldd <br /> downgradient groundwater quality. <br /> ul <br /> Well WSMO1 is to be located at the northern boundary of the <br /> City property. In their letter of April 16, 1986, The <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board cautioned that the <br /> upgradient well had to be located gatedaareasetoate establishn�al <br /> distance from the ponds an <br /> background water quality. While the mounding effect may <br /> cause localized northerly groundwater move menwellhatpthe anorth <br /> direction is southerly. With the monitoring <br /> property line, the groundwater data is most likely to be <br /> z ality. <br /> representative of the background qu <br /> The monitoring wells should be constructed to a depth of 20 <br /> feet. The DWR well data indicate <br /> sidethat <br /> aboutwater <br /> l0efeet below range from <br /> near the surface on the no <br /> grade on the south side. Well WSMO1 uldAbethoSapointtthethe <br /> side of the access drive near entry gate. <br /> entry road slopes down to the field from the frontage road. <br /> Constructing the well as close ai duringcal th <br /> thewetseasonewould <br /> but <br /> allow for easy access to the equipment, and the top of the casing <br /> out of the way of field equip <br /> would be about 7 feet above seasonal high water level . <br /> Appendix C provides a general description of the construction <br /> requirements for the monitoring wells. The monitoring <br /> wells <br /> should be constructed of 2-inch diameter PVC pipe to <br /> facilitate the use of commonly available sampling equipment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.