My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:48:37 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1980-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The September 9th letter also includes a memorandum (attached) from the <br /> California Department of Health Services (CDOHS) which recommends that <br /> the same, more stringent disinfection requirements ( (i .e. 2.2 MPN/100 mL <br /> (monthly median) and 23 MPN/100 mL (daily maximum)) be adopted for the <br /> White Slough discharge during the recreation season to reduce the <br /> possibility of infection from direct water contact recreation in Dredger <br /> Cut. In the letter, it is stated that advanced waste treatment would be <br /> required to meet the 2.2 MPN/100 mL requirement recommended by the <br /> CDOHS. And, although the letter states that the CVRWQCB staff would not <br /> include the CDOHS recommendation in the proposed WDR, such a requirement <br /> could be added by the Board during public hearings on the City's WDR. <br /> Summary of City of Lodi 's Position <br /> After considerable review, the City of Lodi ' s response to the proposed <br /> waste discharge requirements in the September 9th letter is summarized as <br /> follows: <br /> ° The 10/10 mg/L BOD and SS requirements are acceptable to the City. <br /> ° The City is concerned about the proposed TDS requirement, but that <br /> concern will be addressed in a separate letter. <br /> ° The proposed disinfection requirement of 2.2 MPN/100 mL (monthly <br /> median) and 23 MPN/100 mL (daily maximum) will require a substantial <br /> design change in the current project and will result in a significant <br /> delay and financial hardship for the City. <br /> ° The imposition of such a stringent disinfection requirement at this <br /> late date is untimely. <br /> ° An MPN requirement of 2.2 (monthly median)/23 (daily maximum) is NOT <br /> included in the Basin Plan. <br /> ° The proposed disinfection requirement will not appreciably improve the <br /> water quality of the receiving waters due to high background coliform <br /> levels. <br /> ° The proposed, more stringent disinfection requirement is not needed <br /> for summertime discharges to Dredger Cut. <br /> Proposed BOD and SS Requirements <br /> The City of Lodi has no problem with the proposed BOD and SS <br /> requirements. Based on discussions with the CVRWQCB staff, the City and <br /> Black & Veatch have known about these increased requirements since the <br /> planning for this project began in December 1986. As a result, the <br /> design of the White Slough expansion project has been carried out to <br /> satisfy these requirements. <br /> Financial Hardship of Proposed MPN Standard <br /> The proposed MPN requirement of 2.2 (monthly median)/23 (daily maximum) <br /> total coliforms/100 mL will be a major financial hardship for the City. <br /> This proposed requirement has not previously been discussed with the City <br /> or Black & Veatch and, as a result, the planning, design and financing of <br /> the project does not include the facilities necessary to achieve this <br /> more stringent disinfection requirement. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.