My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:48:37 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1980-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FACT SHEET, ATTACHMEP C • _ <br /> WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. 5-00- 2 <br /> CITY OF LODI <br /> WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> protect Dredger Cut. Receiving water monitoring data collected from January 1997 to May 1998 is <br /> outlined below (Stations R-1 through R-4 are as outlined in the Monitoring and Reporting <br /> Program.): <br /> Receiving Water Dissolved Oxygen <br /> Monitoring Results (Monthly Average), and <br /> Number of Samples less than 5 mg/l <br /> Date Flow BOD R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 <br /> (m,gd) (lb/day) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/l) (mg/l) <br /> Jan 97 5.8 532 4.2' (9 of 9)2 7.1 (1 of 9) 8.4 (0 of 9) 4.7 (5 of 9) <br /> Feb 97 5.6 467 5.6 (2 of 8) 8.0 (1 of 8) 9.1 (0 of 8) 6.2 (2 of 8) <br /> Mar 97 5.5 440 5.7 (0 of 4) 11.5 (0 of 4) 11.0 (0 of 4) 10.5 (0 of 4) <br /> Apr 97 5.5 367 5.7 (1 of 6) 10.6 (0 of 6) 11.1 (0 of 6) 9.4 (0 of 6) <br /> May 97 5.6 411 6.2 (0 of 1) 12.2 (0 of 1) 10.8 (0 of 1) 1.5 (0 of 1) <br /> Jun 97 0 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- <br /> Jul 970 <br /> Aug 97 5.7 295 5.1 (2 of 5) 8.4 (0 of 5) 8.8 (0 of 5) 7.2 (0 of 5) <br /> Sep 97 5.5 239 5.2 (3 of 6) 8.7 (0 of 6) 8.7 (0 of 6) 7.7 (0 of 6) <br /> Oct 97 5.3 177 5.9 (0 of 6) 10.4 (0 of 6) 10.5 (0 of 6) 9.6 (0 of 6) <br /> Nov 97 5.5 275 5.2 (1 of 8) 8.6 (0 of 8) 9.3 (0 of 8) 7.0 (0 of 8) <br /> Dec 97 5.9 379 5.8 (1 of 10) 10.1 (0 of 10) 10.8 (0 of 10) 9.3 (0 of 10) <br /> Jan 98 5.9 492 5.6 (2 of 8) 8.2 (0 of 8) 9.4 (0 of 8) 7.3 (0 of 8) <br /> Feb 98 6.3 473 4.4 (7 of 8) 7.4 (0 of 8) 9.0 (0 of 8) 4.9 .(5 of 8) <br /> Mar 98 5.8 532 5.1 (3 of 9) 9.1 (0 of 9) 10.0 (0 of 9) 6.7 (1 of 9) <br /> Apr 98 5.6 514 5.1 (4 of 9) 11.8 (0 of 9) 11.0 (0 of 91 9.9 (0 of 9) <br /> May 98 5.6 448 5.2 (4 of 8) 10.5 (0 of 8) 8.9 (0 of 8) 9.7 (0 of 8) <br /> 1 Monthly average dissolved oxygen concentration <br /> 2 Number of individual samples with dissolved oxygen concentrations less than 5 mg/l compared to the total <br /> number of samples collected. <br /> The data shows that at the current discharge rate of less than 6 mgd, corresponding to a BOD <br /> loading of up to 532 lb/day, the dissolved oxygen in Dredger Cut (R-1) does not meet the Basin <br /> Plan objective for dissolved oxygen of 5 mg/l in 39% of samples collected when discharge was <br /> occurring, whereas it is usually met further downstream below the confluence with Bishop Cut and <br /> White Slough (R-2 and R-3). The discharge is causing or contributing to the violations. Studies <br /> completed to date indicate that the discharge of 8.5 mgd of secondary-treated effluent may cause <br /> violations of the dissolved oxygen objective to also occur in White Slough and Bishop Cut. This <br /> Order includes more stringent effluent limits for BOD than were imposed in the past. This alone <br /> will not prevent excursions of the dissolved oxygen objective in Dredger Cut. Therefore, this Order <br /> also requires the Discharger to maximize land disposal of effluent, and prohibits discharges when <br /> dissolved oxygen concentrations in Dredger Cut are less than 5 mg/l. The Discharger is not <br /> currently capable of meeting these requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.