Laserfiche WebLink
28. See Comment 4 above and detailed comments from Hall & Associates regarding <br /> organochlorine pesticides. <br /> 35. Please note that impacts "a" and "b" were mitigated by actions detailed in the EIR. <br /> 36. See Comment 3 above and detailed comments by Hall & Associates, Exhibit 2, <br /> regarding disinfection. Please also note that cost information was provided by us to the Regional <br /> Board in section 2) of the issues summary attached to our letter dated February 25, 1999. That <br /> summary is also included here as Exhibit 3. <br /> ORDER <br /> B. Effluent Limitations (Discharges to Dredger Cut) <br /> 1. See Comments 4, 5, and 6 above. See comments on cyanide, zinc, lead, organochlorine <br /> pesticides and mass limitations in enclosed detailed comments by Hall & Associates. <br /> 3. See Comment 3 above and detailed comments by Hall & Associates, Exhibit 2, <br /> regarding disinfection. <br /> C. Pond Specifications <br /> 4. There is no basis for this pond pH limitation. It is not protective of beneficial uses, <br /> nuisances, or any other significant issue of concern. We ask that it be removed from the <br /> requirements. <br /> D. Reclamation Specifications <br /> 1. Please revise D.1. to refer to Groundwater Limitation G.3. Also see Comment 2 above. <br /> E. Biosolids Discharge Specifications <br /> 4., 7. If the ceiling concentrations from USEPA 40 CFR 503 Table 3 are applied to the City's <br /> biosolids, then the cumulative loading limits in 40 CFR 503 Table 2 do not apply according to <br /> the text in 40 CFR 503. We ask that EPA 503 Standards be applied consistently. <br /> F. Receiving `'Vater Limitations <br /> 9., 10. See detailed comments by Hall & Associates regarding temperature limitations. <br /> G. Groundwater Limitations <br /> 1., 2., 4. See Comment 2 above. <br /> H. Provisions <br /> 2. See Comment 3 above. <br /> tentcommentsw95 Exhibit 1 Page 6 12/17/99 <br />