My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:48:37 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1980-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Effluent Data Demonstrates Lodi's Discharge Is Not Toxic <br /> In establishing stringent effluent limitations for lead, zinc, and cyanide, the <br /> Regional Board failed to properly demonstrate a reasonable potential to violate narrative <br /> standards, whose general applicability are objectionable. The Clean Water Act ("CWA") <br /> and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR 5 122.44(d) set forth specific procedures <br /> which the Regional Board has acknowledged apply. (See, Central Valley Regional Board <br /> Hearing Agenda Item 4, statement of Elizabeth Jennings (Sept. 19, 1997).) These <br /> applicable and relevant regulations however do not support the Regional Board's decision <br /> to impose zinc, lead, and cyanide limitations based on interpretation of a narrative water <br /> quality standard: no toxics in toxic amounts. Absent a site-specific basis to conclude <br /> narrative criteria were exceeded, the application of this provision to develop more <br /> restrictive metals limitations for zinc and lead was clearly in error and arbitrary and <br /> capricious. <br /> The Regional Board has not produced reliable data that, in conformity with 40 <br /> CFR 122.44(d), demonstrate a potential violation.of the narrative standard. As discussed <br /> in greater detailed below, extensive toxicity testing data demonstrate that the City's <br /> effluent is not toxic. For example, tests performed on daphnids (which are very sensitive <br /> to zinc) passed all except one test over a period of two years, and the one failure appears <br /> to have been related to laboratory error. Moreover, the best available information on <br /> translating dissolved metals criteria to total recoverable effluent limitations was-not used <br /> by staff. Use of EPA's published guidance to implement EPA criteria would have <br /> demonstrated that metals limits are not necessary. <br /> The City requests time to collect the sufficient data to properly evaluate the need <br /> for effluent limitations for zinc, lead, and cyanide. Until that analysis is complete, the <br /> City proposes to conduct monthly monitoring for each parameter. As such, the City <br /> requests a schedule of compliance in the Permit to provide time to obtain this <br /> information. <br /> NPDESPermitComments Exhibit 2 Page 2 12/17/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.