My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 1980-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:48:37 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1980-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
waters. Draft Guidance for Fresh Watei•Beaches (updated April 23, 1999) ("Beach <br /> Guidance"). The purpose of that document is to assist "local health agencies with regard <br /> to the healthfulness of recreational waters and beaches" (Beach Guidance, p. 2). This <br /> guidance is directly applicable to White Slough and Bishop Cut in the context of this <br /> permitting action since the Regional Board has determined that these fresh waters have a <br /> beneficial use of body contact recreation. <br /> DHS recommends informing the public of"contamination of recreational water <br /> and the risk of possible illness," and advising against "swimming and/or water contact" <br /> where monitoring data indicate a microbiological indicator standard is exceeded (Beach <br /> Guidance, p.l). Specifically, DHS recommends posting when a single sample for the <br /> following levels of indicator organisms is exceeded: total coliform 10,000 MPN/100 ml; <br /> fecal coliform, 400 MPN/100m1; enterococcus 61 MPN/100 ml; E. coli 235 NDN/100 <br /> ml. Furthermore, DHS recommends warning the public of potential health hazards when <br /> the 30-day log mean of at least five (5) samples exceeds: total coliform.1000 MPN/100 <br /> ml; fecal coliform, 200 MPN/100ml; enterococcus 33 MPN/100 ml; E. coli 126 <br /> MPN/100 ml. All of these objectives are magnitudes less stringent than the 2.2 MPN <br /> total coliform that DHS has recommended that the Regional Board impose on the City <br /> and demonstrate that a 2.2 MPN total coliform limitation is not required to protect public <br /> health. <br /> b. Federal and Other State Criteria Documents- - <br /> The Basin Plan also states that the Regional Board will rely on published federal <br /> criteria documents to determine the level of water quality necessary to protect beneficial <br /> uses where numeric objectives have not been set. (Basin Plan at III-1.00.) Based upon <br /> health impacts studies and criteria documents, EPA recommends that states use fecal <br /> coliform, E. coli, or enterococcus bacteria as the appropriate indicators for bathing areas. <br /> DHS admits that the standards, which the Regional Board seeks to impose upon the City, <br /> are more restrictive than those imposed anywhere else in the country. (Hultquist <br /> Testimony at 95.) <br /> NPDESPcrrtnitCommcnts Exhibit 2 Page 14 12/17/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.