My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 2000-2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE 2000-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:48:15 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:34:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2000-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. 5-00-031 -4- <br /> CITY OF LODI <br /> WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> concentrations in Dredger Cut are less than 5 mg/l. The Discharger is not capable of meeting <br /> these requirements with the current treaiment, storage and disposal facilities. <br /> 15. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Board have classified this discharge <br /> as a major discharge. <br /> 16. The discharge is presently governed by Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 93-030, <br /> adopted by the Board on 26 February 1993. <br /> 17. The permitted discharge is consistent with the antidegradation provisions of 40 CFR 131.12 and <br /> State Water Resources.Control Board (SWRCB) Resolution No. 68-16. Compliance with these <br /> requirements will result in the use of best practicable treatment or control of the discharge. The <br /> impact on existing water quality will be insignificant. <br /> 18. The SWRCB, on 16 May 1974, adopted Resolution No. 74-43 titled "Water Quality Control <br /> Policy for the Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California". These requirements are consistent <br /> with the Policy. <br /> 19. The SWRCB Water Quality Control Plan.for Control of Temperatures in Coastal and Interstate <br /> Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California (the Thermal Plan) is applicable to this <br /> discharge. For purposes of the Thermal Plan, the Discharge is considered to be an existing <br /> Discharger of elevated temperature waste. <br /> 20. Effluent limitations, and toxic and pretreatment effluent standards established pursuant to <br /> Sections 208(b), 301, 302,304, and 307 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and amendments <br /> thereto are applicable to the discharge. <br /> 21. Information submitted by the Discharger in its "Water Quality Impact Report, White Slough <br /> Water Pollution Control Facility", dated October 1998, estimated the average dilution over a <br /> tidal cycle within Dredger Cut to be 2:1, and at the confluence with White Slough and Bishop <br /> Cut to be 4:1. The report indicates that effluent mixes and moves downstream predominantly in <br /> the north channel of White Slough. <br /> 22. The previous permit provided for a mixing zone for compliance with water quality objectives. <br /> The mixing zone extended throughout the entire length of Dredger Cut, approximately 1500 <br /> meters, to the confluence with Bishop Cut and White Slough. Order No. 93-030 established <br /> effluent limitations for compliance with dissolved oxygen and aquatic toxicity water quality <br /> objectives, and for disinfection to protect public health at the edge of this mixing zone. <br /> With regard to mixing zones, the Basin Plan states, "...the Regional Water Board may designate <br /> mixing zones within which water quality objectives will not apply provided the discharger has <br /> demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that the mixing zone will not <br /> adversely impact beneficial uses... In determining the size of such mixing zones, the Regional <br /> Water Board will consider the applicable procedures and guidelines in EPA's Water Quality <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.