Laserfiche WebLink
FACT SHEET ORDER NO. 5-f-031 <br /> ATTACHMENT C -9- <br /> CITY OF LODI <br /> WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 18 samples. Effluent limitations for lead have been included in this Order based on the converted <br /> chronic criteria. Full compliance with the lead limitations are not required by this Order until <br /> 1 May 2004. <br /> Mercury: Effluent monitoring for mercury has shown the median concentration to be non- <br /> -detectable at <0.2 µg/1, and the highest measured to be 0.63 µg/1. The accuracy of the analyses is <br /> questionable without implementing "clean technique" (EPA Method 1631) for sample collection, <br /> handling, and analyses. The current EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for continuous <br /> concentration of mercury (30-day average, chronic criteria) is 0.77 µg/1, and the proposed California <br /> Toxics Rule concentration is 0.050 µg/1. Mercury is listed under the California 303(d) list as a <br /> pollutant causing impairment in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This listing is based partly on <br /> elevated levels of mercury in fish tissue. Because the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta has been listed <br /> as an impaired water body for mercury based on fish tissue impairment, the discharge must not <br /> cause or contribute to increased mercury levels in fish tissue. <br /> In view of the uncertainty of applicable water quality criteria, and the accuracy of existing sampling <br /> results, this permit contains an interim performance-based effluent limit of 1.36 lbs/year for <br /> mercury. This interim mass limit was developed taking one-half of the average effluent m--rcury <br /> concentration (<0.2 µg/1) and applying that to the average daily flow of 5.6 mgd dischareed to <br /> Dredger Cut for 8 months out of the year and including a 20% allowance in mass loading to account <br /> for unforeseen variability in concentrations. The limit will not become effective until <br /> 1 January 2004, or one year after establishment and approval of a watershed mercury loading offset <br /> program. This Order requires monitoring for mercury using a "clean technique"EPA Method 1631. <br /> The Discharger is required to develop a program for identification and control of mercun, <br /> discharges within the collection system. If mercury is found to be causing toxicity, or if a TMDL <br /> (Total Mass Daily Loading) program is adopted for the Delta, this permit will be reopened and <br /> modified or revised to address the issue of mercury concentrations or loading. <br /> Zinc: The Basin Plan's numerical water quality objective for dissolved zinc is a maximum <br /> concentration of 100 µg/l, which is equivalent to a total recoverable concentration of 101 c:Jl. <br /> EPA's ambient water quality criteria for protection of freshwater aquatic life are a continuous <br /> concentration of 133 µg/l (4-day average, chronic criteria), and a maximum concentration of <br /> 133 µg/1 (expressed as a 1-hour average, acute criteria), using a water hardness of 113 mill. These <br /> criteria were originally developed using metals concentrations expressed as total recoverable <br /> metals, but have been converted to be expressed as dissolved metals. For zinc, the acute CF=0.978 <br /> and the chronic CF=0.986. 40CFR 122.45(c) requires that permit limits be expressed as total <br /> recoverable metal. A reasonable assumption is that the metal concentration in the receiving water is <br /> biologically available to the same extent as during the toxicity testing. Therefore, the wat,-r quality <br /> criteria, expressed as dissolved metal, has been divided by the conversion factor, and presented in <br /> the table, above, for the purpose of comparing the measured effluent concentrations with the <br /> criteria. Sampling results shown that effluent concentrations of zinc have exceeded the converted <br /> acute and chronic criteria, and also the Basin Plan water quality objective if converted to a total <br /> recoverable metal concentration. The Basin Plan objective is the most stringent. An effluent <br />