My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0528038
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 9:54:09 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 8:57:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0528038
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0018998
FACILITY_NAME
NCPA LODI ENERGY CENTER
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.6 LAND USE <br /> TABLE 5.6-6 <br /> Project Conformity with Local Land Use Plans and Policies <br /> Goal/Objective/Policy Project Consistency <br /> (d)The use will not significantly impact transportation The project would have no effect on transportation <br /> facilities, increase air pollution, or increase fuel facilities. Refer to the Air Quality chapter for a <br /> consumption. discussion of project air emissions and measures to <br /> minimize potential air quality impacts. The project <br /> would require the use of natural gas; however, if the <br /> proposed project is not constructed, other electric <br /> generation facilities would be required, which could <br /> also consume fuel. <br /> 7.There shall be no further fragmentation of land <br /> designated for agricultural use, except in the following <br /> cases: <br /> (a) Parcels for homesites may be created, provided The project would have no effect on the County's <br /> that the General Plan density is not exceeded. ability to protect agricultural lands from fragmentation. <br /> (b)A parcel may be created for the purpose of The project would have no effect on the County's <br /> separating existing dwellings on a lot, provided the ability to protect agricultural lands from fragmentation. <br /> Development Title regulations are met. <br /> (c)A parcel may be created for a use granted by Constructing and operating the project would not <br /> permit in the A-G zone, provided that conflicts with require the creation of parcels of land. <br /> surrounding agricultural operations are mitigated. <br /> 8.To protect agricultural land, non-agricultural uses Siting the power plant adjacent to the existing <br /> which are allowed in the agricultural areas should be wastewater treatment plant and mosquito and vector <br /> clustered, and strip or scattered development should control district meets this requirement. <br /> be prohibited. <br /> 10. Non-agricultural land uses at the edge of The power plant site would be fenced, and would be <br /> agricultural areas shall incorporate adequate buffers adjacent to other industrial land uses. <br /> (e.g.,fences and setbacks)to prevent conflicts with <br /> adjoining agricultural operations. <br /> Sources: City of Lodi, 1991; San Joaquin County, 2002. <br /> 5.6.3 Cumulative Effects <br /> A cumulative impact refers to a proposed project's incremental effect together with other <br /> closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects whose impacts may <br /> compound or increase the incremental effect of the proposed project (Public Resources Code <br /> § 21083, California Code of Regulations, title 14, § 15064(h), 15065(c), 15130, and 15355). <br /> In July 2008,21 projects were in various stages of progress with the City of Lodi. Most of <br /> these projects are zoned residential, with a few office, mixed use, institutional, commercial, <br /> and industrial projects proposed. All of these projects are more than 4 miles from the <br /> proposed project, except for the improvements at the White Slough WPCF (Draft EIR issued <br /> March 28,2008),which is adjacent to the project site (Bereket,2008; City of Lodi, 2008c). <br /> In July 2008, 72 projects7 were being processed with the San Joaquin County Building <br /> Department. These projects were located in Acampo, Escalon,Farmington,French Camp, <br /> 7 For the purposes of this discussion,San Joaquin County sorted its projects by project cost,and provided a list of the projects <br /> costing$25,000 or more. <br /> SAC/371322/082330001(LEC_5.6_LAND_USE.DOC) 5.6-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.