Laserfiche WebLink
STIG PROJECT -- EVALUATION OF WATER FOR INJECTION -- 28 March 1994 2 <br /> Il. LIQUID COMPOSITIONS <br /> A partial flow diagram for the system is shown in Figure 1 which is based on the UIC <br /> Permit Application'. Source liquid is processed effluent from the City of Lodi White Slough Water <br /> Pollution Control Facility(WSWPCF).Water drawn from WSWPCF passes through a filter sequence <br /> in the plant, prior to other use. Filtering removes some components that might otherwise be <br /> troublesome. Subsequent processing and uses in the plant increase concentrations of most dissolved <br /> components in liquid sub-streams. Four sub-streams are combined for injection/disposal, which <br /> is the main focus of this review.The several fluid compositions which develop in the plant involve <br /> many technical aspects, including their potential to form mineral scales. Such in-plant factors are <br /> recognized here mainly in terms of their plausible consequences for injectability of the resulting <br /> mixture. <br /> A. Water Compositions <br /> Composition of the source was defined by sampling and chemical analysis over a period <br /> of about nine months in 1992-1993. Twenty-six sets of chemical data were available for this <br /> review. The first fifteen were obtained during a 26-day interval in October-November 1992. The <br /> remainder were obtained at modestly irregular intervals during the succeeding 230 days. Plots of <br /> these data are shown in Figures 2A and 2B. No persistent time-trends appear in the data sett. <br /> Individual component concentrations are generally more variable than ±10 percent of the central <br /> values. Irregular shifts in concentration occur for some components, especially silica. Shifts for <br /> various components are unsynchronized or weakly synchronized.Average numerical compositions <br /> based on these data are used as a basis for modelling. Values are shown in Table 1 where they take <br /> several forms. <br /> Column 1: overall average of measured values derived by; <br /> • weighting the average of the first 15 samples as a single composition <br /> • combining that with the unweighted values of the other eleven compositions so <br /> that average values are based on twelve sets of data spaced fairly regularly <br /> through time <br /> Column 2: median values for the 26-member group <br /> Column 3: column 1 values plus twice the standard deviations <br /> Column 4: design composition used for calculating effects of treatments, particularly <br /> reverse osmosis and evapo-concentration processes. <br /> Columns 5-6:Nominal and high compositions of mixed waters representing in jectate under <br /> different assumptions. <br /> B. Waste Water Streams <br /> The water stream taken from WSWCPF passes through several processes in the plant to <br /> yield wastes of different composition. Three major and one minor waste stream are recombined <br /> for disposal.One objective of this review aims to define the range of concentrations in the mixture <br /> of recombined waste streams, specifically regarding suitability of the mixture for disposal in the <br /> injection well. Rates and concentration factors appear in the lower legend of Figure 1. <br /> DON MICHELS ASSOCIATES -Missoula,Montana USA <br />