Laserfiche WebLink
STIG PROJECT -- EVALUATION OF WATER FOR INJECTION -- 28 March 1994 12 <br /> particulates, not as dissolved forms. Particulates would be removed by the filtration sequence. <br /> Solubility calculations presume dissolved forms, so using the apparent concentrations for <br /> computing mineral stabilities could yield results that are biased, probably strongly biased toward <br /> high apparent supersaturation. <br /> By using apparent concentrations of heavy metals in the solubility calculations, several <br /> iron- and copper-bearing minerals can be identified as "super-saturated"in the processed waters. <br /> These should be regarded as minerals capable of forming in the STIG environment, but probably <br /> it is false to consider that they will form, due to factors described above. Even accepting such <br /> computed indications of mineral deposition, the amounts implied are small. They would likely be <br /> of negligible operational concern in any case. <br /> These same, or related, iron-bearing minerals could also form if corrosion occurred to <br /> ferrous parts of the plant equipment. Thus, development of iron mineral deposits could remain an <br /> item of interest, but their presence would more reasonably be taken as an indicator of corrosion, <br /> rather than an indicator of deposition from water-born components. Some representative mineral <br /> names and compositions are listed in Table 2, where they are indicated to be of negligible concern <br /> to plant operations. <br /> C. Phosphate Minerals <br /> Orthophosphate, ionic units of composition H3-nPO4-n, are common, natural components <br /> of water at low concentrations. Polyphosphates and phosphonates are larger, more complicated <br /> molecular and ionic forms, commonly added as water treatment chemicals and some are <br /> programmed for addition in the STIG plant. <br /> Polyphosphates tend to partly decompose to orthophosphate.Orthophosphate combines with <br /> calcium and other ionic components, notably fluoride, carbonate, and hydroxyl, to form a variety <br /> of mineral forms collectively known as apatite.The most common scale variety, hydroxy-apatite, <br /> and a natural form, fluorapatite, were indicated by WATEQ4F as not being over saturated in any <br /> mixed or single waste water. However, an uncommon form,containing magnesium, fluoride, and <br /> carbonate, was indicated to be over saturated. The potential amount of deposition is large, but the <br /> likelihood of any deposition seems poorly definedls <br /> When water treatment chemicals are present, especially dispersants, which contain <br /> polyphosphate, etc., apatite minerals that manage to form tend to be fine-grained. These may <br /> accumulate as sludge, to be removed periodically from places of accumulation(e.g.stagnant parts <br /> of cooling tower), or as suspended particles which are removed continuously by filtration units. <br /> Since sludge removal and cartridge filters are part of the system design for STIG, the formation <br /> of apatite may be regarded as a normal part of plant operations,presenting no serious or unforseen <br /> risks beyond timely removal operations. <br /> Higher pH and warmer temperatures favor formation of apatite minerals,so they could be <br /> formed intermittently during transient conditions within the waste receiver tank, especially in the <br /> vicinity of boiler surge input. If particulates do form there and become suspended, they could be <br /> removed by cartridge filters maintained between tank and injection well. <br /> Potentially, these phosphate minerals could form as hard crusts (scale) but the planned <br /> dispersants tend to prevent such development. Because the amounts which might form are <br /> DON MICHELS ASSOCIATES - Missoula,Montana USA <br />