Laserfiche WebLink
Steve Royall <br /> NCPA CT-2 Discharge Characterization <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> January 22, 2007 <br /> Typical flow rates for these parameters were included in NCPA"s August 9, 2006 letter to the City. No <br /> specific analysis for these parameters was included in this analysis since there are no standard methods <br /> for analyzing the concentrations of these parameters. <br /> Discussion <br /> This section includes full discussion of all key results of the water quality characterization. In general, <br /> nearly all constituents in the NCPA effluent were either non-detect or were measured at lower <br /> concentrations than in the NCPA plant influent. Out of the full suite of analytes,only nineteen <br /> constituents were measured at higher concentrations in the effluent relative to the influent. Of these <br /> nineteen constituents, only four appeared to exhibit more than a two-fold increase in the effluent over <br /> influent. Of these four constituents, only two constituents appeared to exhibit more than a four-fold <br /> increase in the effluent over influent Three other constituents yielded results that suggest more than a <br /> two-fold increase between influent and effluent, but the data are not conclusive due to sample dilution or <br /> a non-detect measurement in one of the samples. <br /> For water quality parameters which were characterized as exhibiting less than a four-fold increase <br /> between influent and effluent, no mass loading is proven or implied by the slight increase in <br /> concentration of some of the monitored parameters. The measured increase in constituent concentrations, <br /> when apparent at all, are less on a percentage gain basis than the typical decrease in water volume through <br /> the NCPA process. The water discharge volume is typically 25% to 50% of the water accepted, yet no <br /> parameters demonstrated an increase by the 2x to 4x ratio that would be expected from the concentration <br /> cycle in effect at NCPA. The most likely explanation for any increase in constituent concentration less <br /> than 400% is evaporative concentration, not mass loading by NCPA. <br /> The results of analysis for constituents whose effluent concentrations were measured to be higher than <br /> their influent concentrations are summarized in Table 4, below. <br />