My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS UIC PERMIT APP
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0528038
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS UIC PERMIT APP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 9:59:35 AM
Creation date
9/26/2019 9:22:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
UIC PERMIT APP
RECORD_ID
PR0528038
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0018998
FACILITY_NAME
NCPA LODI ENERGY CENTER
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1019
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steve Royall <br /> NCPA CT-2 Discharge Characterization <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> January 22, 2007 <br /> Typical flow rates for these parameters were included in NCPA"s August 9, 2006 letter to the City. No <br /> specific analysis for these parameters was included in this analysis since there are no standard methods <br /> for analyzing the concentrations of these parameters. <br /> Discussion <br /> This section includes full discussion of all key results of the water quality characterization. In general, <br /> nearly all constituents in the NCPA effluent were either non-detect or were measured at lower <br /> concentrations than in the NCPA plant influent. Out of the full suite of analytes,only nineteen <br /> constituents were measured at higher concentrations in the effluent relative to the influent. Of these <br /> nineteen constituents, only four appeared to exhibit more than a two-fold increase in the effluent over <br /> influent. Of these four constituents, only two constituents appeared to exhibit more than a four-fold <br /> increase in the effluent over influent Three other constituents yielded results that suggest more than a <br /> two-fold increase between influent and effluent, but the data are not conclusive due to sample dilution or <br /> a non-detect measurement in one of the samples. <br /> For water quality parameters which were characterized as exhibiting less than a four-fold increase <br /> between influent and effluent, no mass loading is proven or implied by the slight increase in <br /> concentration of some of the monitored parameters. The measured increase in constituent concentrations, <br /> when apparent at all, are less on a percentage gain basis than the typical decrease in water volume through <br /> the NCPA process. The water discharge volume is typically 25% to 50% of the water accepted, yet no <br /> parameters demonstrated an increase by the 2x to 4x ratio that would be expected from the concentration <br /> cycle in effect at NCPA. The most likely explanation for any increase in constituent concentration less <br /> than 400% is evaporative concentration, not mass loading by NCPA. <br /> The results of analysis for constituents whose effluent concentrations were measured to be higher than <br /> their influent concentrations are summarized in Table 4, below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.